Seat Alhambra II 2.0 TDI 115HP manual vs Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB 1.8 Duratorq TDCi 110HP manual

Seat Alhambra II 2.0 TDI 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Charles01 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

18 reasons for

Seat Alhambra II, model available from 2010.
It has 2.0 TDI 115HP diesel engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB, model available from 2005.
It has 1.8 Duratorq TDCi 110HP diesel engine produced from 2005.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB 1.8 Duratorq TDCi 110HP manual
Seat

18 reasons for Seat Alhambra II 2.0 TDI 115KM manual in comparison to Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB 1.8 Duratorq TDCi 110HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

115 > 110 hp
The horsepower of the Seat Alhambra II is by 5 percent grater than the Ford. While the difference is not big this should not affect the car performance to a large extent.
112

Average consumption

5.3 > 6 l
The Seat burns up 0.7 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB 1.8 Duratorq TDCi 110HP manual. The Seat Alhambra II, being classified in „van” class burns up by 3.4 l less of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 8.7 l.
59

Maximal torque

280 > 250 Nm
The Seat Alhambra II has 12 percent more torque than the Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB 1.8 Duratorq TDCi 110HP manual. Even though the majority of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it presents the best how a vehicle acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is insensible so you probably will not feel the difference.
56

Urban consumption

6.6 > 7.8 l
The fuel consumption of the Seat Alhambra II is 1.2 l lower in relation to the Ford Tourneo Connect I. Despite the fact that the difference is small, in the long term it can cause that the vehicle would be considerably cheper to use.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.6 > 13.2 s
The Seat Alhambra II accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 12.6 s, which is 0.6 s less when compared to the Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB 1.8 Duratorq TDCi 110HP manual. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a vehicle.
33

Top speed

184 > 167 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Seat Alhambra II 2.0 TDI 115HP manual is greater as compared to this of the Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 17 kilometers per hour is little and is imperceptible in daily driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.8 > 5.2 l
22

Width

1,901 > 1,793 mm
Width of a car directly influences on room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The width of the Seat Alhambra II 2.0 TDI 115HP manual is larger only by 6 percent in comparison to the Ford and is not really important. The average for the „van” class amounts to around 1,821 mm and is by 4 percent larger than the same attribute of the Seat.
15

Wheelbase

2,925 > 2,912 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Seat Alhambra II has 13 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Seat should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,969 > 1,754 cc
The Seat Alhambra II has by 215 cubic centimeters bigger engine capacity in comparison to the Ford Tourneo Connect I. This may have a little impact when it comes to accleration, as both values does not differ much.
6

Length

4,854 > 4,522 mm
The Seat Alhambra II 2.0 TDI 115HP manual is 332 mm longer when compared to the Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB. Long cars are more spacious and also have bigger trunk. While the Seat Alhambra II occurs to be better for families or drivers who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB 1.8 Duratorq TDCi 110HP manual may be more appropriate to singles as it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,617 > 1,552 mm
1

Model release date

2010 > 2005
The difference in date of commencement of production between these two vehicles is only 5 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Seat Alhambra II may feature more advanced solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
0

Payload

2,360 > 2,333 kg
0

Front track

1,571 > 1,505 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Curb weight

1,774 > 1,566 kg

Ford

5 reasons for Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB 1.8 Duratorq TDCi 110KM manual in comparison to Seat Alhambra II 2.0 TDI 115HP manual

Reasons for
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 1,750 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the maximum torque is reached shows us how fast an engine achieves its best performance with increase in rotational speed. The lower rmp or the wider range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt faster.
8

Maximum load capacity

759 > 588 kg
1

Height

1,980 > 1,720 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of luggage to it. The difference of 15 % to the advantage of the Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB 1.8 Duratorq TDCi 110HP manual is insignificant and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

3,500 > 4,200 revolutions/minute
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,112 > 2,078 mm

Cars specifications

Seat Alhambra II 2.0 TDI 115HP manual Ford Tourneo Connect I LWB 1.8 Duratorq TDCi 110HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 2,002 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK