Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual vs Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4

Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

15 reasons for

Ford Windstar II, model available from 1999 to 2003.
It has 3.0 V6 148HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

8 reasons for

Honda Odyssey II, model available from 1999 to 2004.
It has 2.3 16V 150HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4
Ford

15 reasons for Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148KM manual in comparison to Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

615 > 282 l
The trunk of the Ford Windstar II is 333 liters more spacious in relation to the Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Ford Windstar II will be a way more handy. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can hold.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

4,079 > 1,234 l
22

Width

1,917 > 1,793 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Ford Windstar II is 7 percent wider in relation to the Honda Odyssey II. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

97 > 66 l
The Honda Odyssey II is worst that the Ford in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual is able to take by 47 % more fuel than its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

3,074 > 2,838 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more desirable car's weight distribution. Ford Windstar II has 236 mm longer wheelbase distance when compared to Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Ford Windstar II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
12

Urban range

636 > 458 km
8

Engine capacity

2,987 > 2,255 cc
The engine displacement of the Ford is by 732 cc larger than the Honda Odyssey II. As a result the Honda will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Ford Windstar II will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

5,125 > 4,768 mm
The Ford Windstar II is 357 mm longer than the Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases provide more storage space. Although the Ford Windstar II seems to be better pick for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 may appeal to women because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,600 > 1,557 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a better construction of a engine with all cylinders aligned in one row which in our opinion} is with more adventages. Engine of V configuration installed in a the Ford Windstar II produces more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime can house more cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Better engine work and thrilling sound is certainly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
1

Height

1,792 > 1,632 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of loading big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 10 % in favor of the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual is insignificant and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,700 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,643 > 1,558 mm
0

Curb weight

1,805 > 1,492 kg

Honda

8 reasons for Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 148 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Honda that has by 1 % horsepower more when compared to the Ford, which makes this vehicle a bit better in terms of high speed. With more horsepower the Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 will also give slightly better flexiblility in specific gears.
56

Urban consumption

14.2 > 15.6 l
The fuel consumption of the Honda Odyssey II is 1.4 l lower in relation to the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual. Despite the fact that the difference is little, in the long run it may make that your vehicle would be significantly cheper to use.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12 > 13.5 s
A little difference at the level of 1.5 s shows that the Ford Windstar II is the worst vehicle of these two . In the „van class, being represented by the Ford, the medium acceleration to 100km/h is 12.6 s and is by 0.9 s higher than this of Ford vehicle.
33

Top speed

185 > 180 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Honda Odyssey II is greater in comparison to this of the Ford Windstar II which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 5 kilometers per hour is little and is imperceptible in daily driving.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2004 > 2003
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Tire profile

65 > 75 %

Cars specifications

Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 1999
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    Payload 2,445 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK