The horsepower is a something that most of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Ford Windstar II which has by 6 % horsepower more when compared to the Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual, which makes this vehicle somewhat quicker. Thanks to more horsepower the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual should as well give slightly better flexiblility in specific gears.
The boot of the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual is 404 l bigger than the Mitsubishi. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual will be a way more convenient. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can carry.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The maximum speed of the Ford Windstar II is greater in relation to this of the Mitsubishi Santamo by 3, which allows the Ford Windstar II to overcome quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Ford is 222 millimeters wider in comparison to the Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank size is Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual which is able to hold by 64 % more petrol in relation to the Mitsubishi Santamo.
The wheelbase of a car equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Ford Windstar II has 357 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Mitsubishi Santamo. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Ford Windstar II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
The engine size of the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual is by 50 % bigger in comparison to the Mitsubishi. As a result the Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Ford will be of better quality, working more smoothly and more durable.
Maximum load capacity
The Ford is 13 % longer than the Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual. Long cars have roomy cabin and usually have plenty of trunk space. While the Ford occurs to be better choice for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mitsubishi Santamo may be more appropriate to the young because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
An engine in the shape of a V is a
upgraded version of a
which according to us is
wiser to choose one. Engine of V characteristic
installed inside a vehicle the Ford Windstar II
produces more torque at lower RPM ranges because of
the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of
motor can house high numbers of
cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A
Better engine work and thrilling sound is
to driving fans certainly to a V engine’s advantage.
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of loading big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 174 millimeters in favor of the Ford Windstar II is little and does not matter much.