Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual vs Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual

Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

19 reasons for

Ford Windstar II, model available from 1999 to 2003.
It has 3.0 V6 148HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

4 reasons for

Mitsubishi Santamo, model available from 1999 to 2001.
It has 2.0 i 16V 139HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2001.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual
Ford

19 reasons for Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

148 > 139 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Ford Windstar II which has by 6 % horsepower more when compared to the Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual, which makes this vehicle somewhat quicker. Thanks to more horsepower the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual should as well give slightly better flexiblility in specific gears.
38

Trunk capacity

615 > 211 l
The boot of the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual is 404 l bigger than the Mitsubishi. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual will be a way more convenient. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can carry.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

4,079 > 1,713 l
33

Top speed

180 > 175 km/h
The maximum speed of the ​​Ford Windstar II is greater in relation to this of the Mitsubishi Santamo by 3, which allows the Ford Windstar II to overcome quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,917 > 1,695 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Ford is 222 millimeters wider in comparison to the Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

97 > 59 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank size is Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual which is able to hold by 64 % more petrol in relation to the Mitsubishi Santamo.
15

Wheelbase

3,074 > 2,717 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Ford Windstar II has 357 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Mitsubishi Santamo. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Ford Windstar II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

2,987 > 1,996 cc
The engine size of the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual is by 50 % bigger in comparison to the Mitsubishi. As a result the Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Ford will be of better quality, working more smoothly and more durable.
8

Maximum load capacity

630 > 620 kg
6

Length

5,125 > 4,516 mm
The Ford is 13 % longer than the Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual. Long cars have roomy cabin and usually have plenty of trunk space. While the Ford occurs to be better choice for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mitsubishi Santamo may be more appropriate to the young because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a upgraded version of a In-line engine which according to us is wiser to choose one. Engine of V characteristic installed inside a vehicle the Ford Windstar II produces more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can house high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Better engine work and thrilling sound is to driving fans certainly to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Height

1,792 > 1,618 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of loading big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 174 millimeters in favor of the Ford Windstar II is little and does not matter much.
1

Tire width

205 > 185 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,800 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,445 > 2,067 kg
0

End of model sale

2003 > 2001
0

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″
0

Curb weight

1,805 > 1,448 kg

Mitsubishi

4 reasons for Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139KM manual in comparison to Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual

Reasons for
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.8 > 13.5 s
The Mitsubishi Santamo can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 12.8 s, which is 5 percent in comparison to the Ford Windstar II. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into consideration when buying a car.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Tire profile

70 > 75 %

Cars specifications

Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual Mitsubishi Santamo 2.0 i 16V 139HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 1999
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    Payload 2,445 kg 2,067 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK