Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual vs Mitsubishi Space Runner II 2.0 136HP manual

Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

18 reasons for

Ford Windstar II, model available from 1999 to 2003.
It has 3.0 V6 148HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

6 reasons for

Mitsubishi Space Runner II, model available from 1999 to 2002.
It has 2.0 136HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2002.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Space Runner II 2.0 136HP manual
Ford

18 reasons for Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Space Runner II 2.0 136HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

148 > 136 hp
The horsepower of the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual is by 9 percent bigger in comparison to the Mitsubishi Space Runner II. As the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
38

Trunk capacity

615 > 430 l
The Ford has 185 l larger luggage compartment than the Mitsubishi Space Runner II. Such a difference is significant therefore it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Ford Windstar II has 85 liters bigger trunk capacity than the average in its segment. Bigger trunk will be useful during family traveling and also during daily car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

4,079 > 1,798 l
22

Width

1,917 > 1,691 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Ford Windstar II is 13 percent wider when compared to the Mitsubishi Space Runner II. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

97 > 62 l
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank size is Ford Windstar II that can take by 56 % more fuel in comparison to the Mitsubishi Space Runner II.
15

Wheelbase

3,074 > 2,553 mm
The Ford Windstar II has 20 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Mitsubishi Space Runner II. As a result the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
12

Urban range

636 > 516 km
8

Engine capacity

2,987 > 1,996 cc
The Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual has 50 % bigger engine size in relation to the Mitsubishi Space Runner II 2.0 136HP manual. The difference is large. As a result the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine capacity usually equals worst fuel efficiency.
8

Maximum load capacity

630 > 580 kg
6

Length

5,125 > 4,290 mm
The Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual is 835 mm longer in relation to the Mitsubishi Space Runner II. The length of the car is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual will be better driven but the Mitsubishi Space Runner II will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length .
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A Vee engine is a improved version of a engine with all cylinders aligned in one row which according to us is {a better one. Engine of V configuration put in a vehicle the Ford Windstar II produces more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may contain high numbers of cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Smooth engine work and nicer sound is undoubtedly to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Height

1,792 > 1,650 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Ford Windstar II, which is by 9 percent higher than the Mitsubishi Space Runner II, is appropriate pick for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Payload

2,445 > 1,883 kg
0

End of model sale

2003 > 2002
0

Curb weight

1,805 > 1,301 kg

Mitsubishi

6 reasons for Mitsubishi Space Runner II 2.0 136KM manual in comparison to Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

12.2 > 15.6 l
The Mitsubishi uses 3.4 l of fuel less in city traffic compared to the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual. The Mitsubishi, which represents van class, consumes 0.7 l more fuel, which constitutes by 6 % more result than the average in its segment. The difference in fuel consumption between compared vehicles is really significant, so note that in order to the the comparison was adequate, you should check vehicles of similar parameters.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11 > 13.5 s
The Mitsubishi Space Runner II 2.0 136HP manual accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 11 sek, which is 19 percent better result in relation to the Ford. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into consideration when buying a ride.
33

Top speed

185 > 180 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Mitsubishi Space Runner II is greater compared with the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual by 5 kilometers per hour, which allows the Mitsubishi Space Runner II 2.0 136HP manual to cover faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 3 % is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Tire profile

65 > 75 %

Cars specifications

Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual Mitsubishi Space Runner II 2.0 136HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 1999
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    Payload 2,445 kg 1,883 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK