Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual vs Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual

Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual

Source: IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

21 reasons for

Ford Windstar II, model available from 1999 to 2003.
It has 3.0 V6 148HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

7 reasons for

Mitsubishi Space Star (1998), model available from 1998 to 2005.
It has 1.8 16V 112HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2005.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual

21 reasons for Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual

Reasons for

Maximal power

148 > 112 hp
The Ford Windstar II comes with petrol which makes by 36 more horsepower than the the engine of the Mitsubishi, transforming the car to a much more dynamic character. It should be better option to those who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.

Trunk capacity

615 > 370 l
With more luggage capacity the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional car than the Mitsubishi. If the size of the boot is important to you, the Ford will be better choice because it is around 66 percent larger than the trunk of its competitor.

Trunk capacity with seats down

4,079 > 1,371 l


1,917 > 1,700 mm
Width of a vehicle affects interior space for travelers and also stability while driving. The Ford is widther only by 217 mm in relation to the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „van” segment amounts to 1,821 millimeters and is by 96 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual.

Fuel tank

97 > 54 l
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank capacity is Ford Windstar II that can hold by 43 l more gasoline compared with the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual.


3,074 > 2,499 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Ford has 575 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Mitsubishi Space Star (1998). Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Ford Windstar II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.


6 > 4

Engine capacity

2,987 > 1,833 cc
The engine displacement of the Ford is by 1,154 cubic centimeters larger in relation to the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998). For this reason the Mitsubishi will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Ford Windstar II will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.

Maximum load capacity

630 > 465 kg


5,125 > 4,030 mm
The Ford Windstar II is longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual by 1,095 mm and it offers to passengers much more room for legs in the car as well as it has more roomy boot. In the „van” class, to which the car of brand Ford is assigned, the average length amouts to 4,628 millimeters and is by 11 % greater than the length of the Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual.

Rear track

1,600 > 1,470 mm

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a developed version of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which in our opinion} is with more adventages. Engine of V characteristic put in a vehicle the Ford Windstar II gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime can contain more cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Smooth engine work and nicer sound is certainly to a Vee engine’s advantage.

Model release date

1999 > 1998
The difference in date of commencement of production between presented vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Ford Windstar II may feature more modern solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.


1,792 > 1,513 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Ford Windstar II, which is by 18 percent higher than the Mitsubishi, would be better choice for you. However, these two cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.

Tire width

205 > 185 mm

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,500 revolutions/minute

Number of seats

7 > 5


2,445 > 1,695 kg

Front track

1,643 > 1,475 mm

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″

Curb weight

1,805 > 1,232 kg


7 reasons for Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112KM manual in comparison to Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual

Reasons for

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.2 > 13.5 s
The Ford Windstar II can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower than the Mitsubishi. The difference in the amount of 24 percent is quite low and for that reason it should not be substantially taken by you into as important when choosing one of presented vehicles.

Top speed

185 > 180 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) is greater than the Ford Windstar II by 3, which allows the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) to travel quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 5 kilometers per hour is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car generally means a hatchback (however estate cars also count as 5-door cars) and as a result the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual, which whole rear including the window lifts up and the rear seats folds flat giving more space for cargo, has an advantage on the 4-door Ford Windstar II which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2

End of model sale

2005 > 2003


16 > 12

Tire profile

65 > 75 %

Cars specifications

Ford Windstar II 3.0 V6 148HP manual Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    Payload 2,445 kg 1,695 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK