Honda Accord VI Coupe 2.0 i 16V 147HP vs Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual

Honda Accord VI Coupe 2.0 i 16V 147HP

Source: wikipedia.org Bull-Doser All Rights Released into the public domain

8 reasons for

Honda Accord VI Coupe, model available from 1998 to 2002.
It has 2.0 i 16V 147HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2002.
Drive has manual gearbox.

4 reasons for

Mazda 626 V Hatchback, model available from 1997 to 2002.
It has 1.9 100HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2001.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual
Honda

8 reasons for Honda Accord VI Coupe 2.0 i 16V 147KM in comparison to Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

147 > 100 hp
The Honda Accord VI Coupe 2.0 i 16V 147HP comes with petrol which delivers by 47 percent more horsepower than the Mazda 626 V Hatchback, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It should be better car to those who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
22

Width

1,785 > 1,705 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Honda is 80 mm wider in comparison to the Mazda 626 V Hatchback. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

66 > 64 l
The Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual is worst that the Honda Accord VI Coupe in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Honda Accord VI Coupe is able to carry by 3 % more fuel in relation to its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,677 > 2,613 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Honda Accord VI Coupe has 64 mm longer wheelbase distance than Mazda 626 V Hatchback. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Honda should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
6

Length

4,764 > 4,572 mm
The Honda is 4 % longer than the Mazda 626 V Hatchback. Long cars more of passenger space and in most cases have plenty of trunk space. Although the Honda Accord VI Coupe 2.0 i 16V 147HP occurs to be better choice for families or drivers who value comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mazda 626 V Hatchback may appeal to women because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,524 > 1,471 mm
1

Model release date

1998 > 1997
The difference in date of commencement of production between these two vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a dizzying pace and for that reason the Honda Accord VI Coupe 2.0 i 16V 147HP may feature more advanced technologies.
0

Front track

1,511 > 1,465 mm

Mazda

4 reasons for Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100KM manual in comparison to Honda Accord VI Coupe 2.0 i 16V 147HP

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

502 > 468 l
If you need a vehicles by which you could set of for journeys, which could load more things in the boot , decide to buy the Mazda 626 V Hatchback. The Honda Accord VI is equiped with by 7 percent smaller luggage compartment in relation to the Honda Accord VI so probably in this case you would be able to take with you one bag less. When it comes to the luggage compartment also check its width length and height which have considerable effect on loading possibility .
3

Number of doors

5 > 2
A way more comfortable and practical vehicle is five-door Mazda. The 2-door Honda has less pluses, besides more attractive silhouette.
1

Height

1,429 > 1,393 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of luggage to it. The difference that amounts to 36 mm to the advantage of the Mazda 626 V is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4

Cars specifications

Honda Accord VI Coupe 2.0 i 16V 147HP Mazda 626 V Hatchback 1.9 100HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1998 1997
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
    Payload - 1,685 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK