The fuel economy is considerably to Mazda's advantage. This vehicle uses 2.4 l fewer petrol in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Honda Accord VIII Estate 2.0 VTEC 156HP manual. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the D class, in which the Mazda 6 III Estate is classified, is 7.7 l whereas the Mazda uses by 30 percent less fuel than the average.
The Mazda has 17 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Honda Accord VIII Estate. Even though the majority of drivers do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it shows the best how fast a car is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is insensible so it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
The Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual burns up 2.9 l fewer fuel in the city in comparison to the Honda. The difference at the level of 29 % is really perceptible in daily usage of the ride. Moreover, in a long run it will give you significant savings. Bear in mind that fuel consumption may vary depending on how dynamic you drive
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A little difference in the amount of 1 % shows that the Honda Accord VIII Estate 2.0 VTEC 156HP manual is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „mid-size segment, being represented by the Honda Accord VIII, the medium acceleration to 100km/h is 9.9 s and is by 0.2 s lower than this of Honda car.
The Mazda 6 III Estate has 100 liters
more capable luggage compartment
than the Honda Accord VIII Estate 2.0 VTEC 156HP manual.
Such a difference is big
therefore it will is relevant to the comfort of the
vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that
the Mazda has
trunk size than the average in its segment. Bigger
trunk will be useful during family
traveling as well as during
daily car’s usage.
Trunk capacity with seats down
Maximal torque RPM
A greater range as well as a lower value of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always recommended to see a torque performance graph.
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mazda 6 III is 5 millimeters wider than the Honda Accord VIII. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual has 37 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in relation to Honda. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Mazda 6 III should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
Number of gears
The Mazda 6 III Estate has only one more
speed than the
Honda Accord VIII Estate. Most often this
extra gear is a very
tall one so that the previous
gears can be narrower in order to
allow increased performance in the
lower gears. One more gear as well will result in smaller
fuel consumption and CO2 output.
The Mazda is 56 mm longer in relation to the Honda Accord VIII. Long cars are more spacious and also have more storage space. Although the Mazda 6 III seems to be better pick for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Honda Accord VIII Estate may appeal to singles as it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
Model release date
Because of the fact that the Honda Accord VIII was launched only 5 years before the Mazda 6 III, the distance in technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Mazda 6 III may have slightly more new solutions used in it.
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 5 millimeters in favor of the Mazda 6 III is insignificant and does not matter much.