Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual vs Honda Accord VIII Estate 2.0 VTEC 156HP manual

Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thesupermat Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

18 reasons for

Mazda 6 III Estate, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Honda Accord VIII Estate, model available from 2007.
It has 2.0 VTEC 156HP petrol engine produced from 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Honda Accord VIII Estate 2.0 VTEC 156HP manual
Mazda

18 reasons for Mazda 6 III Kombi 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145KM manual in comparison to Honda Accord VIII Estate 2.0 VTEC 156HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.4 > 7.8 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Mazda's advantage. This vehicle uses 2.4 l fewer petrol in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Honda Accord VIII Estate 2.0 VTEC 156HP manual. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the D class, in which the Mazda 6 III Estate is classified, is 7.7 l whereas the Mazda uses by 30 percent less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

209 > 192 Nm
The Mazda has 17 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Honda Accord VIII Estate. Even though the majority of drivers do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it shows the best how fast a car is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is insensible so it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
56

Urban consumption

7 > 9.9 l
The Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual burns up 2.9 l fewer fuel in the city in comparison to the Honda. The difference at the level of 29 % is really perceptible in daily usage of the ride. Moreover, in a long run it will give you significant savings. Bear in mind that fuel consumption may vary depending on how dynamic you drive
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.6 > 9.7 s
A little difference in the amount of 1 % shows that the Honda Accord VIII Estate 2.0 VTEC 156HP manual is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „mid-size segment, being represented by the Honda Accord VIII, the medium acceleration to 100km/h is 9.9 s and is by 0.2 s lower than this of Honda car.
38

Trunk capacity

506 > 406 l
The Mazda 6 III Estate has 100 liters more capable luggage compartment than the Honda Accord VIII Estate 2.0 VTEC 156HP manual. Such a difference is big therefore it will is relevant to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Mazda has 45 liters bigger trunk size than the average in its segment. Bigger trunk will be useful during family traveling as well as during daily car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,649 > 1,182 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,005 > 4,100 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower value of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always recommended to see a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 6.2 l
22

Width

1,845 > 1,840 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mazda 6 III is 5 millimeters wider than the Honda Accord VIII. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

1,107 > 855 km
15

Wheelbase

2,752 > 2,715 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual has 37 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in relation to Honda. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Mazda 6 III should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

861 > 657 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,319 > 1,032 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mazda 6 III Estate has only one more speed than the Honda Accord VIII Estate. Most often this extra gear is a very tall one so that the previous gears can be narrower in order to allow increased performance in the lower gears. One more gear as well will result in smaller fuel consumption and CO2 output.
6

Length

4,806 > 4,750 mm
The Mazda is 56 mm longer in relation to the Honda Accord VIII. Long cars are more spacious and also have more storage space. Although the Mazda 6 III seems to be better pick for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Honda Accord VIII Estate may appeal to singles as it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2007
Because of the fact that the Honda Accord VIII was launched only 5 years before the Mazda 6 III, the distance in technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Mazda 6 III may have slightly more new solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,475 > 1,470 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 5 millimeters in favor of the Mazda 6 III is insignificant and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

6,000 > 6,300 revolutions/minute

Honda

4 reasons for Honda Accord VIII Kombi 2.0 VTEC 156KM manual in comparison to Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

156 > 145 hp
The horsepower of the Honda Accord VIII is by 8 % grater in comparison to the Mazda 6 III Estate. While the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
33

Top speed

212 > 206 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Honda is greater in comparison to this of the Mazda 6 III Estate by 6 kilometers per hour, which allows the Honda to cover quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
19

Fuel tank

66 > 62 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Honda Accord VIII Estate 2.0 VTEC 156HP manual that can contain 4 l more fuel than the Mazda. The average fuel container size in the large family cars segment, from which the Honda Accord VIII comes from, is 63 liters, whereas in large family cars segment (represented by the Mazda 6 III) it equals 63 liters.
0

Payload

1,989 > 1,980 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual Honda Accord VIII Estate 2.0 VTEC 156HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,498 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK