Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Honda CR-V II 2.0 16V 150HP manual 4x4

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

18 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Honda CR-V II, model available from 2002 to 2006.
It has 2.0 16V 150HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Honda CR-V II 2.0 16V 150HP manual 4x4
Nissan

18 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Honda CR-V II 2.0 16V 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 9.9 l
The Nissan Qashqai II uses 4.3 l less fuel in the combined cycle than the Honda CR-V II. The difference in the amount of 43 % will be quite very appreciable in everyday usage of the car. In the long term it can generate a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 11.7 l
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual uses of 41 percent petrol fewer while driving inside city in comparison to the Honda CR-V II. The Nissan Qashqai II, which is classified in mini 4x4 class, uses 2.7 l of fuel for every 100 km fewer than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “compact SUV” segment equals to 9.6 l of fuel for every 100 km.
33

Top speed

183 > 177 km/h
The top velocity of the Nissan Qashqai II is greater in comparison to this of the Honda which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 6 kilometers per hour is small and is imperceptible in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower number of rotations at which the highest torque is delivered affects an engine’s performance. Still, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always recommended to see a torque graph.
22

Width

1,800 > 1,779 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability on road. The Nissan Qashqai II is widther by 1 % in comparison to the Honda CR-V II and is not really relevant. The medium for the „mini 4x4” segment equals to 1,797 millimeters and is by 3 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual.
19

Range

982 > 598 km
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,612 mm
The Nissan Qashqai II has 32 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Honda. Thanks to this the Nissan Qashqai II is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
12

Urban range

797 > 496 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan Qashqai II have a higher speed count in comparison to the Honda CR-V II 2.0 16V 150HP manual 4x4 which means that Nissan Qashqai II will achieve better speeding up and better fuel economy. But the difference is quiet little and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not observe the difference.
6

Length

4,380 > 4,360 mm
The Nissan Qashqai II is 20 millimeters longer than the Honda CR-V II. Long vehicles are more spacious and also have more storage space. Although the Nissan seems to be better for families or those who love the idea of comfortable rides, the Honda CR-V II may be more appropriate to singles because it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,563 > 1,535 mm
1

Model release date

2014 > 2002
Manufacture of the older car commenced 12 years prior to Honda CR-V II 2.0 16V 150HP manual 4x4 and for this reason it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle has not so advanced technologies .
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Rim diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,538 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Honda

10 reasons for Honda CR-V II 2.0 16V 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 115 hp
The Honda CR-V II 2.0 16V 150HP manual 4x4 has 35 horsepowers more horsepower than Nissan. The Honda CR-V II 2.0 16V 150HP manual 4x4 will be distinctly better speed up because of grater power. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing other cars while driving should be a piece of cake for the Honda CR-V II equipped with more powerful motor.
59

Maximal torque

192 > 190 Nm
The Honda CR-V II has 1 % more torque in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II. Even though the vast majority of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a car, it presents the best how fast a car is speeding up. In this case the difference is little and for that reason you probably will not feel the difference.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.1 > 11.3 s
The Nissan speeds up relatively slower than the Honda CR-V II. The difference in the amount of 1.2 s is not really significant and it should not be substantially taken into as important when choosing one of these two cars.
38

Trunk capacity

525 > 438 l
With more boot size the Honda CR-V II 2.0 16V 150HP manual 4x4 will have much more room for loading things and be more functional vehicle than the Nissan Qashqai II. If the capacity of the trunk is what does appeal to you, the Honda will be better choice as it is about 20 percent larger than the trunk of its rival.
19

Fuel tank

59 > 54 l
In this category it is the Honda CR-V II that can carry 9 % more fuel in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. The average fuel container size in the compact SUV segment, from which the Honda CR-V II comes from, equals 61 liters, whereas in compact SUV class (represented by the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual) it amounts to 61 l.
8

Engine capacity

1,999 > 1,198 cc
The engine size of the Honda is by 801 cc larger than the Nissan. In a consequence the Nissan will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Honda CR-V II will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.
8

Maximum load capacity

550 > 542 kg
1

Height

1,682 > 1,590 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Honda CR-V II 2.0 16V 150HP manual 4x4, which is by 6 percent higher than the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual, would be appropriate choice for you. However, presented cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Payload

1,908 > 1,860 kg
0

Curb weight

1,361 > 1,314 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Honda CR-V II 2.0 16V 150HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2014 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK