Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 vs Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4

Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Luftfahrrad Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

16 reasons for

Honda CR-V III SUV, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

13 reasons for

Jeep Wrangler III, model available from 2006.
It has 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4
Honda

16 reasons for Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.3 > 11.5 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Honda's advantage. This automobile uses 28 percent fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Jeep Wrangler III. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 segment, in which the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 is classified, equals to 7.5 l while the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 consumes by 11 % more fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

10.4 > 16.2 l
The Honda CR-V III burns up of 36 % fuel fewer in city traffic compared to the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4. The Honda, as a representative of mini 4x4 class, consumes of 0.8 l/100Km more than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “compact SUV” class equals to 9.6 l per 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.2 > 11.2 s
A little difference at the level of 1 s suggests that the Jeep Wrangler III is the worst car of these two presented. In the „compact SUV class, being represented by the Jeep Wrangler III, the average acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.9 s and is by 3 % higher than this of Jeep car.
38

Trunk capacity

424 > 141 l
The boot of the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 is 283 l more spacious in relation to the Jeep Wrangler III. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Honda will be a way more useful. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can take with you on a journey.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

953 > 431 l
33

Top speed

190 > 174 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Honda CR-V III is greater in relation to the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 by 9, which allows the Honda to overcome faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 9 percent is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
19

Range

716 > 612 km
15

Wheelbase

2,615 > 2,423 mm
The Honda has 192 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Jeep Wrangler III. Thanks to this the Honda CR-V III is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

558 > 435 km
6

Length

4,530 > 4,218 mm
The Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 is 312 millimeters longer in relation to the Jeep Wrangler III. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also have plenty of trunk space. Although the Honda CR-V III SUV occurs to be better choice for families or persons who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 may be more appropriate to the young as it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
3

Number of doors

5 > 2
Much more comfortable and useful car is five-door Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4. The two-door Jeep Wrangler III has less advantages, except for more aggressive look.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

60 > 75 %

Jeep

13 reasons for Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

200 > 150 hp
The Jeep has 33 percent more horsepower in relation to Honda. The Jeep Wrangler III will be distinctly faster accelerate because of grater horsepower. Also passing other cars while driving should be much more easier for a car equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

317 > 190 Nm
The Jeep Wrangler III has 67 % more torque than the Honda CR-V III. The difference at such level is quite big, so that the Jeep Wrangler III will be seeding up perceptibly better.
22

Width

1,873 > 1,822 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Jeep Wrangler III is 51 mm wider than the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

71 > 59 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank size is Jeep that can carry by 12 l more gasoline compared with the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

3,779 > 1,998 cc
The Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 has 1,781 cubic centimeters larger cubic capacity in relation to the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4. The difference is relatively notable. As a result the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand bigger engine capacity usually equals worst fuel consumption.
8

Maximum load capacity

515 > 481 kg
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a upgraded version of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which according to us is wiser to choose one. Engine of V characteristic put inside a the Jeep Wrangler III gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor may contain high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Better engine work and nicer sound is undoubtedly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
1

Height

1,865 > 1,682 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Jeep, which is by 11 percent higher than the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4, is better option for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

245 > 225 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,200 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,215 > 2,055 kg
0

Curb weight

1,709 > 1,571 kg

Cars specifications

Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - JK
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK