The Honda is equipped with petrol which produce by 33 more horsepower over the Mitsubishi ASX SUV, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It should be better option for drivers who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
The Honda CR-V III has 38 newton meters more torque when compared to the Mitsubishi. Even though a great deal of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when choosing a automobile, it informs the best how a car is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is quite big and for that reason the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 will provide you with better feeling of driving.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A small difference in the amount of 11 percent suggests that the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual is somewhat beaten in this confrontation. In the „mini 4x4” class, to which the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 0.5 s faster than acceleration of Mitsubishi’s car.
If you need a vehicles by which you could set of for travels, which could carry more luggage , pick the Honda CR-V III SUV. The Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual has by 1 percent less capable trunk compared with the Mitsubishi ASX so in this case you would be able to put in the trunk one small parcel less. Examining the luggage compartment pay attention to its dimensions which have considerable effect on loading capability .
The maximum speed of the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 is greater than the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual by 4, which allows the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 to cover quicker large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 4 % is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Honda is 3 % wider in comparison to the Mitsubishi. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The engine capacity of the Honda is by 409 cubic centimeters larger when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. For this reason the Mitsubishi will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Honda will be of better quality, working more smoothly and more durable.
The Honda is 234 millimeters longer than the Mitsubishi. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases provide more storage space. While the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 seems to be better option for families or persons who value convenient rides, the Mitsubishi may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of carrying massive amount of luggage to it. The difference of 67 millimeters to the advantage of the Honda CR-V III is not big and should not be really noticeable.