Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Luftfahrrad Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

13 reasons for

Honda CR-V III SUV, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
Honda

13 reasons for Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 115 hp
The Honda CR-V III has 30 % more horsepower in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II. The Honda CR-V III will be distinctly better speed up thanks to bigger power. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing obstacles like TIRs or buses should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with stronger motor.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.2 > 11.3 s
The Honda CR-V III SUV can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 10.2 s, which is 10 percent than the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
33

Top speed

190 > 183 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Honda CR-V III is greater than of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual by 7 km/h, which allows the Honda to overcome faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 7 kilometers per hour is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,822 > 1,800 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin and also stability on road. The Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 is widther only by 22 mm in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II and is not really important. The medium for the „mini 4x4” class equals to 1,797 millimeters and is by 25 millimeters larger than the width of the Honda CR-V III.
19

Fuel tank

59 > 54 l
The Nissan Qashqai II gives way to the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Honda is able to hold by 9 % more fuel in comparison to its contender.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,198 cc
The Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 has 800 cc bigger engine size in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II. The difference is notable. As a result the Honda CR-V III should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine capacity means worst fuel consumption.
6

Length

4,530 > 4,380 mm
The Honda is 150 mm longer in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II. Long cars more of passenger space and usually have bigger trunk. Although the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 seems to be better choice for families or drivers who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Nissan Qashqai II may appeal to singles as it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
1

Height

1,682 > 1,590 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4, which is by 92 millimeters higher than the Nissan Qashqai II, is better option for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Payload

2,055 > 1,860 kg
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

60 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,571 > 1,314 kg

Nissan

11 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 8.3 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Nissan's advantage. This vehicle burns 33 percent less gasoline in the mixed cycle than the Honda. Note that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the small off-road 4x4 segment, in which the Nissan Qashqai II is classified, equals to 7.5 l while the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual burns up by 25 percent less fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 10.4 l
The Nissan Qashqai II consumes 3.5 l fewer fuel in city traffic compared with the Honda CR-V III. The difference at the level of 34 percent is very big in use of vehicle. Additionally, during long period of time it may generate real and noticeable cost savings. Also note that estimated results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably lifted if you drive swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles selected by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
38

Trunk capacity

438 > 424 l
If you need a vehicles for long cruises, which could load more things in the boot , pick the Nissan Qashqai II. The Honda is equiped with by 14 liters less capable luggage compartment compared with the Honda so probably you would be able to carry a bit less. When it comes to the luggage compartment also pay attention to its dimensions which have substantial effect on loading possibility .
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the maximum torque is reached indicates how fast an engine reaches its full efficiency with growth in rotational speed. The lower rmp or the wider range at which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt faster.
19

Range

982 > 716 km
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,615 mm
Nissan Qashqai II has 1 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Honda CR-V III SUV. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

797 > 558 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan have a higher gear count in comparison to the Honda CR-V III SUV which means that Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will have faster acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and if you are not drag racing at a timed event you would not even feel the difference.
8

Maximum load capacity

542 > 481 kg
1

Model release date

2014 > 2006
Manufacture of the older car commenced much more earlier than Honda CR-V III SUV and for this reason it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle is equipped with not so advanced parts .
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 6,200 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,199 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK