The fuel economy is considerably to Honda's advantage. This vehicle uses 21 % less fuel in the combined cycle than the Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4. Note that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the compact SUV segment, in which the Honda is classified, is 7.5 l while the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 needs by 8 percent less fuel than the average.
Because of 53 percent higher torque, the engine of the Honda CR-V III distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Jeep Compass SUV. This, in turn, have relevant effects on a car's acceleration.
The fuel economy (urban) is distinctly to the Honda CR-V III's advantage. This automobile burns 23 % less fuel in city traffic in comparison to the Jeep Compass SUV. Better fuel econumy equals less fuel cost passed on you.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4 speeds up relatively slower compared with the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting. The
difference at the level of
4 % is
quite little and it should
not be vitally taken by you into
consideration for selecting the better one of these two
With more trunk space the Honda will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull vehicle compared with the Jeep Compass SUV. If the size of the trunk is appeals to you, the Honda will be better to choose because it is around 223 liters larger than the boot of its competitor.
The top velocity of the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 is greater than of the Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4 by 2, which allows the Honda CR-V III to overcome faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 2 percent is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
Such a big difference stems from the fact that both cars are equipped with various engines. The Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting is equipped with the diesel engine and the Jeep has the petrol engine. Taking into consideration different types of engines, comparing this characteristic is pointless.
The Honda CR-V III is 4 percent longer in relation to the Jeep Compass SUV. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases have bigger trunk. While the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting occurs to be better for families or those who appreciate comfortable driving, the Jeep Compass may be more appropriate to women because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 47 millimeters in favor of the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 is small and does not matter much.