Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 vs Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4

Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

17 reasons for

Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting, model available from 2006.
It has 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2012.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Jeep Compass SUV, model available from 2007.
It has 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4
Honda

17 reasons for Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.9 > 8.7 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Honda's advantage. This vehicle uses 21 % less fuel in the combined cycle than the Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4. Note that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the compact SUV segment, in which the Honda is classified, is 7.5 l while the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 needs by 8 percent less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

340 > 222 Nm
Because of 53 percent higher torque, the engine of the Honda CR-V III distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Jeep Compass SUV. This, in turn, have relevant effects on a car's acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

8.1 > 10.5 l
The fuel economy (urban) is distinctly to the Honda CR-V III's advantage. This automobile burns 23 % less fuel in city traffic in comparison to the Jeep Compass SUV. Better fuel econumy equals less fuel cost passed on you.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.3 > 10.7 s
The Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4 speeds up relatively slower compared with the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting. The difference at the level of 4 % is quite little and it should not be vitally taken by you into consideration for selecting the better one of these two vehicles.
38

Trunk capacity

558 > 335 l
With more trunk space the Honda will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull vehicle compared with the Jeep Compass SUV. If the size of the trunk is appeals to you, the Honda will be better to choose because it is around 223 liters larger than the boot of its competitor.
33

Top speed

187 > 183 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 is greater than of the Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4 by 2, which allows the Honda CR-V III to overcome faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 2 percent is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,000 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
Such a big difference stems from the fact that both cars are equipped with various engines. The Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting is equipped with the diesel engine and the Jeep has the petrol engine. Taking into consideration different types of engines, comparing this characteristic is pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.8 > 7.6 l
6

Length

4,574 > 4,404 mm
The Honda CR-V III is 4 percent longer in relation to the Jeep Compass SUV. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases have bigger trunk. While the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting occurs to be better for families or those who appreciate comfortable driving, the Jeep Compass may be more appropriate to women because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,520 mm
1

Height

1,677 > 1,630 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 47 millimeters in favor of the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 is small and does not matter much.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,565 > 1,520 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,096 > 1,810 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″
0

Curb weight

1,566 > 1,437 kg

Jeep

4 reasons for Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 140 hp
The horsepower of the Jeep is by 30 horsepowers grater in comparison to the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting. While the difference is small this should not affect the car performance extensively.
15

Wheelbase

2,640 > 2,615 mm
The Jeep Compass has 25 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting. Therefore the Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4 is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Engine capacity

2,360 > 2,205 cc
The Jeep has by 7 percent bigger engine size than the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4. This may have a little impact on vehicle's performance, as both figures are quite simmilar.
1

Model release date

2007 > 2006
The difference in debut day between these two vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Jeep may feature more advanced technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.

Cars specifications

Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2007
    Facelifting yes no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,042 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK