Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

19 reasons for

Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting, model available from 2006.
It has 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2012.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
Honda

19 reasons for Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.9 > 7.7 l
The Honda CR-V III uses 10 % fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. The Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4, which is palced in „small off-road 4x4” class burns up by 0.6 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.
59

Maximal torque

340 > 197 Nm
The Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting has 73 % more torque in relation to the Mitsubishi. The difference at this level is relevant, so that the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 will accelerate significantly faster.
56

Urban consumption

8.1 > 9.7 l
The fuel consumption of the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 is 1.6 l better than the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long run it may make that your vehicle would be much less expensive to utilize.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.3 > 10.8 s
A little difference that amounts to 5 percent suggests that the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual is the worst car of these two compared. In the „mini 4x4 class, being represented by the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, the average acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 0.1 s lower than this of Mitsubishi vehicle.
33

Top speed

187 > 184 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Honda CR-V III is greater than the Mitsubishi Outlander III by 2, which allows the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting to cover quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 2 % is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,000 > 4,195 revolutions/minute
This huge difference stems from the fact that both cars have various engines. The Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 is equipped with the diesel engine while the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV has the petrol engine. As both cars have different kinds of engines, comparing this characteristic is pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.8 > 6.3 l
22

Width

1,822 > 1,799 mm
Width of a vehicle influences on interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The width of the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 is larger by 1 percent compared with the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual and is not really important. The medium for the „mini 4x4” segment is 1,797 mm and is by 25 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Honda CR-V III.
19

Range

866 > 800 km
12

Urban range

716 > 619 km
11

Extra-urban range

983 > 952 km
8

Engine capacity

2,205 > 1,997 cc
The Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 has 10 % bigger engine displacement in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. Because the difference is little, the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting should accelerate only a bit dynamically, if other paramerters are the same.
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,540 mm
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,565 > 1,540 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

60 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,566 > 1,440 kg

Mitsubishi

9 reasons for Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147KM manual in comparison to Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

147 > 140 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi Outlander III is by 5 % grater in relation to the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4. Because the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
15

Wheelbase

2,680 > 2,615 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better vehicle's weight distribution. Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual has 65 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Honda. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Mitsubishi Outlander III should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
9

Ground clearance

216 > 175 mm
Ground clearance means the minimum distance between the vehicle underbody and the ground. As far as the two compared vehicles are concerned, it is the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV which has 41 mm higher ground clearance when compared with the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting. For this reason the Mitsubishi Outlander III will cope better with dirt roads and obstacles in the city. However, the higher ride height means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the vehicle.
8

Maximum load capacity

630 > 473 kg
6

Length

4,654 > 4,574 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander III is 80 mm longer in relation to the Honda. Long cars have roomy cabin and usually provide more storage space. While the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual occurs to be better for families or drivers who love the idea of convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 may appeal to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2006
Manufacture of the older vehicle started much more earlier than its contender hence man may suspect that this vehicle has not so advanced technologies .
1

Height

1,682 > 1,677 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of loading massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 5 mm to the advantage of the Mitsubishi Outlander III is small and does not matter much.
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Payload

2,065 > 2,042 kg

Cars specifications

Honda CR-V III SUV Facelifting 2.2 i-CDTi 140HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,600 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2012
    Facelifting yes no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK