Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4 vs Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual

Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4

Source: ppmfl Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

21 reasons for

Nissan GT-R Coupe, model available from 2007.
It has 3.8 285HP ic petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Honda CR-Z Coupe, model available from 2010 to 2013.
It has 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual

21 reasons for Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual

Reasons for

Maximal power

285 > 114 hp
The Nissan has 171 horsepowers bigger amount of horses under the hood in comparison to the Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual. The difference is huge and so it have a significant impact on joy of traveling the car. It may be interesting to know that the Nissan has by 46 hp more horsepower compared to the average in its class.

Maximal torque

588 > 145 Nm
When you push the gas pedal and you start speeding up quickly, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will experience it better sitting at the steering wheel of the Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4 because it has 306 % more torque when compared to the Honda CR-Z Coupe. Compared cars vary so much that only driving the Nissan you will experience a pleasurable feeling of getting pushed back in the seat as the car accelerate.

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

3.5 > 9.9 s
The Honda can reach the speed of 100Km/h by 65 percent slower in relation tohis competitor. The appreciable difference in acceleration being in the Nissan GT-R’s favour obviously points out better model.

Trunk capacity

315 > 225 l
With more trunk space the Nissan will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull one than the Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual. If the size of the boot is important to you, the Nissan will be better to buy because it is about 40 % larger than the trunk of its rival.

Top speed

311 > 200 km/h
The Honda CR-Z has 111 km/h smaller maximum speed compared to the Nissan, thanks to which driving a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will take much more time. The difference might be noticeable during travelling on on the road without speed limits to the car of Nissan brand advantage.

Maximal torque RPM

3,205 > 4,800 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is delivered determines an engine’s performance. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to check a torque graph.


1,895 > 1,740 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The width of the Nissan GT-R is larger by 9 % in comparison to the Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual and is not really worth considering. The average for the „sports cars” segment equals to 1,791 millimeters and is by 6 % smaller than the same feature of the Nissan.

Fuel tank

73 > 41 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Nissan GT-R Coupe which can hold 32 liters more fuel than the Honda. The average fuel container size in the S class, from which the Nissan comes from, is 68 l, whereas in sports cars class (represented by the Honda CR-Z) it equals 68 liters.


2,770 > 2,422 mm
Nissan GT-R Coupe has 14 % longer wheelbase when compared to the Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.

Extra-urban range

974 > 909 km

Engine capacity

3,800 > 1,498 cc
The engine capacity of the Honda CR-Z Coupe is so much lower ( around 154 percent less in comparison to the Honda CR-Z, that it is pointless to take the decision which car is better choice. These cars are so varying that on the basis of information about engine capacity we can only pick between car’s performance and car’s economy.


4,670 > 4,080 mm
The Nissan GT-R is 14 % longer in relation to the Honda. The length of the car plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Nissan GT-R probably will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Nissan GT-R Coupe will be better driven ,however, the Honda will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length .

Rear track

1,599 > 1,503 mm

Number of doors

3 > 2
An owner of the Nissan GT-R has an additional door at the back of a car. It will enable him to load and unload cargo into a boot in more convenient manner, especialy when it comes to things of big size. Passages of both cars who want to seat in the back have to enter a car through a front door which needs folding a front seat.

Tire width

255 > 195 mm


automatic > manual
For a comfortable drive in the city, it is tempting to opt for an automatic but the type of transmisison may have a substantial effect on fuel efficiency. Automatics may use about from 5 to 10% more than manuals.


1,958 > 1,523 kg

Front track

1,590 > 1,520 mm

Tire diameter

20 > 15 ″

Tire profile

40 > 55 %

Curb weight

1,744 > 1,175 kg


9 reasons for Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114KM manual in comparison to Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for

Average consumption

5.2 > 10.3 l
The Honda CR-Z Coupe burns up 50 % fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle than the Nissan. The difference at the level of 5.1 l will be perceptible in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long term it will result in a real savings.

Urban consumption

6.1 > 15.3 l
The Honda burns up 9.2 l fewer fuel in city traffic compared with the Nissan GT-R. The difference at the level of 9.2 l will be very significant in use of vehicle. Additionally, during several years it may bring real and noticeable cost savings. Moreover you shoule take int consideration that medium results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably lifted if you ride dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the cars selected by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 7.4 l


800 > 718 km

Urban range

656 > 484 km

Ground clearance

136 > 107 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in many important parameters of a vehicle. Clearance is the most important for SUV cars though all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual has 27 percent higher clearance in relation to the Nissan GT-R. Apart from easier mobility in rough terrain, the Honda CR-Z will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as large curbs, for example.

Maximum load capacity

350 > 220 kg

Model release date

2010 > 2007
The difference in release date between presented vehicles is only 3 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Honda CR-Z may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.

Maximal power RPM

6,100 > 6,400 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4 Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2007 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload 1,958 kg 1,523 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK