The Volvo C70 II is considerably snappier in comparison to the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio because it has by o 102 % higher horsepower. The dynamism of this vehicle will give you a good deal more joy of driving this car.
When you step on the gas and you start speeding up rapidly, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will experience it better driving the Volvo as it has by 175 Nm more torque in comparison to the Honda CR-Z. These two cars differ so much that only riding the Volvo C70 II you will have a pleasurable feeling of getting pressed back in the seat as the car starts to accelerate.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Volvo C70 II can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 8 s, which is 1.9 s less when compared to the Honda CR-Z Coupe. However the difference is not as much big to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
With more trunk space the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull one compared with the Honda. If the capacity of the trunk is what does appeal to you, the Volvo will be better to choose as it is around 178 l more spacious than the boot of the Honda.
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic is greater compared with the Honda CR-Z Coupe by 35 km/h, which allows the Volvo C70 II to travel quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 18 % is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is produced clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio. The engine of the Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual reaches its full efficiency at 4,800 revolutions/minute which is by 3,300 revolutions per minute lower compared with the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic.
distance between left and right side of a car influences on interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic is widther only by 6 % compared with the Honda CR-Z Coupe and is not really relevant. The medium for the „sports cars” segment is approximately 1,791 millimeters and is by 3 percent larger than the same attribute of the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic.
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Volvo C70 II that can hold by 19 liters more gasoline in comparison to the Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual.
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic has 9 % longer wheelbase distance than Honda CR-Z Coupe. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
The engine displacement of the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio is by 68 % greater when compared to the Honda CR-Z Coupe. In a consequence the Honda will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
Maximum load capacity
The Volvo is 13 % longer in comparison to the Honda CR-Z. The length of the vehicle is significant in terms of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic will be better driven ,however, the Honda CR-Z Coupe will be a little easier to park due to shorter length .
For a gentle ride in the city, it is tempting to opt for an automatic however the choice of transmisison can have a considerable effect on fuel consumption. Automatics may use about from 5 to 10% more than manuals.