Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic vs Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual

Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org GuyFrancis Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

23 reasons for

Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio, model available from 2007.
It has 2.5 T5 230HP ic petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Honda CR-Z Coupe, model available from 2010 to 2013.
It has 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual
Volvo

23 reasons for Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230KM automat in comparison to Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

230 > 114 hp
The Volvo C70 II is considerably snappier in comparison to the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio because it has by o 102 % higher horsepower. The dynamism of this vehicle will give you a good deal more joy of driving this car.
59

Maximal torque

320 > 145 Nm
When you step on the gas and you start speeding up rapidly, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will experience it better driving the Volvo as it has by 175 Nm more torque in comparison to the Honda CR-Z. These two cars differ so much that only riding the Volvo C70 II you will have a pleasurable feeling of getting pressed back in the seat as the car starts to accelerate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8 > 9.9 s
The Volvo C70 II can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 8 s, which is 1.9 s less when compared to the Honda CR-Z Coupe. However the difference is not as much big to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
38

Trunk capacity

403 > 225 l
With more trunk space the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull one compared with the Honda. If the capacity of the trunk is what does appeal to you, the Volvo will be better to choose as it is around 178 l more spacious than the boot of the Honda.
33

Top speed

235 > 200 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic is greater compared with the Honda CR-Z Coupe by 35 km/h, which allows the Volvo C70 II to travel quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 18 % is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 4,800 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is produced clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio. The engine of the Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual reaches its full efficiency at 4,800 revolutions/minute which is by 3,300 revolutions per minute lower compared with the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic.
22

Width

1,836 > 1,740 mm
distance between left and right side of a car influences on interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic is widther only by 6 % compared with the Honda CR-Z Coupe and is not really relevant. The medium for the „sports cars” segment is approximately 1,791 millimeters and is by 3 percent larger than the same attribute of the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic.
19

Fuel tank

60 > 41 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Volvo C70 II that can hold by 19 liters more gasoline in comparison to the Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,422 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic has 9 % longer wheelbase distance than Honda CR-Z Coupe. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
8

Engine capacity

2,522 > 1,498 cc
The engine displacement of the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio is by 68 % greater when compared to the Honda CR-Z Coupe. In a consequence the Honda will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
8

Maximum load capacity

380 > 350 kg
6

Length

4,615 > 4,080 mm
The Volvo is 13 % longer in comparison to the Honda CR-Z. The length of the vehicle is significant in terms of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic will be better driven ,however, the Honda CR-Z Coupe will be a little easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,560 > 1,503 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Tire width

235 > 195 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a gentle ride in the city, it is tempting to opt for an automatic however the choice of transmisison can have a considerable effect on fuel consumption. Automatics may use about from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,100 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,102 > 1,523 kg
0

Front track

1,550 > 1,520 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,025 > 2,016 mm
0

Tire diameter

17 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

45 > 55 %
0

Curb weight

1,718 > 1,175 kg

Honda

8 reasons for Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114KM manual in comparison to Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.2 > 9.3 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Honda CR-Z Coupe's advantage. This vehicle burns 44 % fewer fuel in the mixed cycle than the Volvo. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the S segment, in which the Honda CR-Z is classified, is 9.7 l while the Honda CR-Z Coupe uses by 46 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

6.1 > 14 l
The Honda CR-Z Coupe consumes of 7.9 l gasoline fewer in the urban cycle than the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic. The Honda CR-Z, as a representative of sports cars class, consumes of 7.4 l per 100 km less than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “sports cars” class equals to 13.5 l of fuel for every 100 km.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 6.7 l
19

Range

800 > 638 km
12

Urban range

656 > 429 km
11

Extra-urban range

909 > 896 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Honda CR-Z has a one extra speed than the Volvo. Generally the additional gear is used as an overdrive so that the previous gears can be shorter in order to allow better acceleration in the lower speeds. One more gear as well helps to lower fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
1

Model release date

2010 > 2007
Given that the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic started to be manufactured only 3 years prior to the Honda CR-Z Coupe, the distance in technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Honda CR-Z Coupe may have a bit more advanced solutions applied in it.

Cars specifications

Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic Honda CR-Z Coupe 1.5 i-VTEC IMA 114HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2007 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload 2,102 kg 1,523 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK