Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual vs Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88HP manual

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

25 reasons for

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback, model available from 2005 to 2012.
It has 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP diesel engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Honda Concerto Hatchback, model available from 1988 to 1995.
It has 1.4 16V 88HP petrol engine produced from 1988 to 1995.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88HP manual
Peugeot

25 reasons for Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90KM manual in comparison to Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

90 > 88 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Peugeot 307 II which has by 2 horsepower more in relation to the Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88HP manual, which makes this vehicle a bit faster. Because of more horsepower the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback will also provide somewhat better efficiency in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 7.9 l
The Peugeot 307 II uses 3 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88HP manual. The difference at the level of 3 liters will be quite perceptible in everyday usage of the car. In the long period of time it will bring you a real savings.
59

Maximal torque

214 > 112 Nm
Because of 102 Nm more torque, the engine of the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Honda. This, in turn, produces better a car's acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

6.1 > 9 l
The fuel consumption running around the town is distinctly to the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual's advantage. This car consumes 2.9 l less oil in built up area when compared to the Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88HP manual. Better fuel consumption equals less fuel cost passed on you.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.5 > 12.6 s
The Peugeot 307 II Hatchback can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 12.5 s, which is 1 percent faster than the Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88HP manual. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a car.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,326 > 818 l
33

Top speed

179 > 172 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual is greater in relation to the Honda Concerto by 4, which allows the Peugeot to cover faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 4 % is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,745 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
Such a big difference results from the fact that both compared vehicles have different engines. The Peugeot is equipped with the diesel engine and the Honda Concerto has the petrol engine. Taking into consideration different kinds of engines, comparing this feature is pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.5 > 5.8 l
22

Width

1,740 > 1,691 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The Peugeot is widther by 3 percent in relation to the Honda Concerto and is not really relevant. The average for the „lower middle” segment is approximately 1,703 millimeters and is by 37 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback.
19

Range

1,224 > 714 km
19

Fuel tank

61 > 56 l
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank size is Peugeot 307 II Hatchback which can take by 9 % more diesel than the Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,610 > 2,559 mm
Peugeot 307 II has 2 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

984 > 611 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,395 > 932 km
8

Engine capacity

1,561 > 1,397 cc
The Peugeot 307 II Hatchback has 164 cubic centimeters bigger cubic capacity compared to the Honda Concerto. For the reason that the difference is little, the Peugeot 307 II should accelerate slightly dynamically, if other paramerters are does not play a role.
4

Rear track

1,499 > 1,455 mm
1

Height

1,522 > 1,395 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Peugeot, which is by 127 mm higher than the Honda, is appropriate pick for you. However, presented cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Model release date

2005 > 1988
1

Tire width

195 > 175 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,300 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,505 > 1,453 mm
0

End of model sale

2012 > 1995
0

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″
0

Curb weight

1,293 > 1,027 kg

Honda

2 reasons for Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

371 > 338 l
The boot of the Honda Concerto is only 10 percent bigger than the Peugeot 307 II. However, the difference is not big it would be fair to say that both vehicles have more of less the same boot capacity.
6

Length

4,270 > 4,212 mm
The Honda Concerto is 1 % longer than the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and space in the boot. The Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88HP manual preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Honda will be better driven ,however, the Peugeot will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.

Cars specifications

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual Honda Concerto Hatchback 1.4 16V 88HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,364 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2005 1988
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK