Opel Combo D Tour 1.4 95HP manual vs Honda Jazz III 1.2 i-VTEC 90HP manual

Opel Combo D Tour 1.4 95HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

16 reasons for

Opel Combo D Tour, model available from 2011.
It has 1.4 95HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Honda Jazz III, model available from 2008.
It has 1.2 i-VTEC 90HP petrol engine produced from 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Honda Jazz III 1.2 i-VTEC 90HP manual
Opel

16 reasons for Opel Combo D Tour 1.4 95KM manual in comparison to Honda Jazz III 1.2 i-VTEC 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

95 > 90 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of us pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Opel that has by 5 horsepower more than the Honda Jazz III, which makes this vehicle slightly faster. Having more horsepower the Opel Combo D Tour should as well give slightly better efficiency in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

127 > 114 Nm
Maximum torque of the Opel Combo D is 13 newton meters greater than the Honda Jazz III. Because of this, the Opel Combo D will accelerate somewhat better and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also make that the Opel Combo D Tour will use less fuel for every 100 km.
38

Trunk capacity

790 > 375 l
The boot of the Opel Combo D is 111 % larger compared to the Honda Jazz III. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Opel Combo D Tour 1.4 95HP manual will be a way more practical. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can take.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

3,199 > 1,318 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,500 > 4,900 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to analyze a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,828 > 1,697 mm
Distance between two sides of a car affects room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The width of the Opel Combo D is larger by 8 % in comparison to the Honda Jazz III and is not really worth considering. The average for the „microvan” class is 1,748 mm and is by 5 % smaller than the same feature of the Opel.
15

Wheelbase

2,755 > 2,495 mm
The Opel Combo D Tour has 260 mm longer wheelbase than Honda Jazz III 1.2 i-VTEC 90HP manual. As a result the Opel is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
8

Engine capacity

1,369 > 1,199 cc
The Opel Combo D Tour has 14 percent greater engine capacity compared to the Honda. As the difference is little, the Opel Combo D Tour should accelerate only slightly dynamically, if other paramerters are does not play a role.
6

Length

4,390 > 3,900 mm
The Opel Combo D is 490 mm longer in relation to the Honda Jazz III. Long cars have more interior space and also have more storage space. While the Opel seems to be better choice for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Honda may appeal to women because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,530 > 1,477 mm
1

Model release date

2011 > 2008
Given that the Honda Jazz III's production began only 3 years earlier than the Opel, the distance in technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Opel might feature slightly more modern solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,847 > 1,524 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference at the level of 323 mm to the advantage of the Opel Combo D Tour 1.4 95HP manual is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Maximal roof load

100 > 55 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

503 > 453 kg
0

Front track

1,510 > 1,492 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,117 > 2,029 mm

Honda

4 reasons for Honda Jazz III 1.2 i-VTEC 90KM manual in comparison to Opel Combo D Tour 1.4 95HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 7.4 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Honda's advantage. This car consumes 24 % less fuel in the combined cycle than the Opel Combo D Tour 1.4 95HP manual. Note that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the microvan segment, in which the Honda Jazz III 1.2 i-VTEC 90HP manual is classified, is 6.1 l while the Honda Jazz III 1.2 i-VTEC 90HP manual needs by 8 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.6 > 15.4 s
A small difference in the amount of 2.8 s suggests that the Opel Combo D Tour 1.4 95HP manual is insensibly beaten here. In the „microvan” class, to which the Opel Combo D Tour 1.4 95HP manual is assigned, the medium acceleration amounts to 13.6 s and is by 1.8 s faster than acceleration of Opel’s vehicle.
33

Top speed

177 > 161 km/h
The top velocity of the Honda is higher as compared to this of the Opel Combo D Tour which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 16 km/h is small and is imperceptible in daily driving.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,002 > 1,000 kg

Cars specifications

Opel Combo D Tour 1.4 95HP manual Honda Jazz III 1.2 i-VTEC 90HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,000 kg 1,002 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2008
    Facelifting no no
    Code name D -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK