Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual vs Honda Logo 1.3 65HP manual

Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

20 reasons for

Mazda 121 III, model available from 1996 to 2003.
It has 1.2 75HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Honda Logo, model available from 1996 to 2001.
It has 1.3 65HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2001.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Honda Logo 1.3 65HP manual
Mazda

20 reasons for Mazda 121 III 1.2 75KM manual in comparison to Honda Logo 1.3 65HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

75 > 65 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Mazda 121 III which has by 15 % horsepower more in relation to the Honda Logo 1.3 65HP manual, which makes this vehicle slightly quicker. Because of more horsepower the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual will as well provide slightly better efficiency in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

6.4 > 6.5 l
The Mazda 121 III uses 0.1 l less fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Honda. The Mazda 121 III, being classified in „small cars” class burns up by 0.4 l more of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 6 liters.
56

Urban consumption

7.3 > 7.8 l
The Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual consumes 6 percent less in city traffic in comparison to the Honda Logo. The difference in the amount of 6 percent is not perceptible in daily usage of the vehicle, however, during the period of a few years it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.7 > 14.5 s
A small difference at the level of 12 percent suggests that the Honda Logo 1.3 65HP manual is somewhat beaten in this confrontation. In the „subcompact” class, to which the Honda Logo 1.3 65HP manual is assigned, the average acceleration is 12.9 s and is by 13 percent faster than acceleration of Honda’s vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

252 > 230 l
If you need a car by which you could set of for travels, which could carry more luggage , pick the Mazda 121 III. The Honda Logo has by 10 % less capable trunk compared with the Honda so in this case you would be able to load one bag less. Assessing the luggage compartment also check its width length and height which have considerable effect on loading possibility .
33

Top speed

170 > 152 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Mazda is greater in relation to of the Honda Logo by 12, which allows the Mazda to cover faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 18 km/h is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
19

Range

636 > 635 km
19

Fuel tank

42 > 41 l
The Honda Logo is worst that the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Mazda 121 III is able to hold by 1 liter more fuel in relation to its contender.
15

Wheelbase

2,456 > 2,360 mm
The Mazda 121 III has 96 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Honda Logo 1.3 65HP manual. As a result the Mazda 121 III is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

560 > 513 km
6

Length

3,828 > 3,750 mm
The Mazda 121 III is 2 percent longer in relation to the Honda Logo. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases have bigger trunk. Although the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual seems to be better pick for families or those who value soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Honda Logo may appeal to the young as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Mazda 121 III is more convenient and if you regularly carry more than one passenger then this car is only possible option for you. The strongest point of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the rear seats but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Honda Logo 1.3 65HP manual very often look more dynamic and sporty and for those who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Honda Logo 1.3 65HP manual may be better one.
1

Tire width

185 > 175 mm
0

Payload

1,436 > 1,364 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2003 > 2001
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Tire diameter

14 > 13 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

915 > 786 kg

Honda

5 reasons for Honda Logo 1.3 65KM manual in comparison to Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,642 > 1,637 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Honda is 5 mm wider when compared to the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
8

Engine capacity

1,344 > 1,242 cc
The Honda Logo has by 102 cubic centimeters greater engine size in relation to the Mazda 121 III. This may have a little impact in terms of acceleration, as both values does not vary much.
8

Maximum load capacity

575 > 520 kg
1

Height

1,488 > 1,330 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Honda Logo 1.3 65HP manual, which is by 158 mm higher than the Mazda 121 III, is better choice for you. However, these two cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual Honda Logo 1.3 65HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,436 kg 1,364 kg

Compare with other cars

By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK