Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual

Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

14 reasons for

Honda Odyssey II, model available from 1999 to 2004.
It has 2.3 16V 150HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

8 reasons for

Mitsubishi Space Star (1998), model available from 1998 to 2005.
It has 1.8 16V 112HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2005.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual
Honda

14 reasons for Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 112 hp
The Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 has by 38 horsepowers more horsepower in comparison to Mitsubishi. The Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 will be distinctly better speed up thanks to bigger horsepower. Also passing other vehicles while moving along the road should be much more easier for the Honda equipped with more powerful engine.
22

Width

1,793 > 1,700 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 is 5 % wider in relation to the Mitsubishi. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

66 > 54 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Honda Odyssey II that can hold 22 % more fuel than the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998). The medium fuel tank capacity in the van class, which is represented by the Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4, equals 70 liters, whereas in van class (represented by the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual) it equals 70 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,838 > 2,499 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 has 339 mm longer wheelbase distance than Mitsubishi. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Honda should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
8

Engine capacity

2,255 > 1,833 cc
The Honda has 23 % bigger engine size than the Mitsubishi. Because the difference is small, the Honda Odyssey II should accelerate slightly better, of course assuming that other paramerters are does not play a role.
6

Length

4,768 > 4,030 mm
The Honda is 738 millimeters longer when compared to the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998). The length of the car is significant in terms of driving comfort and space in the boot. The Honda Odyssey II preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Honda Odyssey II will be better driven ,however, the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,557 > 1,470 mm
1

Model release date

1999 > 1998
Given that the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998)'s production started only 1 year before the Honda Odyssey II, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles is not really big, however, the Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 might have a bit more modern solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,632 > 1,513 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 119 millimeters to the advantage of the Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 is not big and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

205 > 185 mm
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Front track

1,558 > 1,475 mm
0

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″
0

Curb weight

1,492 > 1,232 kg

Mitsubishi

8 reasons for Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112KM manual in comparison to Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.9 > 11 l
The Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) consumes 28 percent less amount of fuel in the mixed cycle than the Honda Odyssey II. The difference in the amount of 28 % will be realy noticeable in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long run it will bring you a considerable reduction of costs.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.2 > 12 s
A small difference in the amount of 1.8 s indicates that the Honda Odyssey II is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „van class, being represented by the Honda Odyssey II, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 12.6 s and is by 5 percent lower than this of Honda vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

370 > 282 l
The Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual has 88 liters larger trunk than the Honda. Such a difference is significant therefore it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) has 30 percent bigger boot size than the average in its class. More spacious boot will be useful during family journeys and also while everyday car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,371 > 1,234 l
19

Range

714 > 602 km
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A five-door car usually means a hatchback (however estate cars also count as 5-door cars) and because of that the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998), where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats giving more space for cargo, has the edge over the four-door Honda Odyssey II which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 5,700 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2005 > 2004

Cars specifications

Honda Odyssey II 2.3 16V 150HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    Payload - 1,695 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK