Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 vs Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

18 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 8 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4
Land Rover

18 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

340 > 189 hp
The Land Rover has 151 horsepowers more horsepower in comparison to Hyundai Santa Fe II. The Land Rover will be distinctly faster accelerate because of bigger horsepower. Also passing obstacles like TIRs or buses while driving should be much more easier for a car equipped with more powerful motor.
59

Maximal torque

448 > 250 Nm
The Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 has 79 % more torque in comparison to the Hyundai. The difference at this level is relevant, so that the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV will accelerate perceptibly faster.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.3 > 10 s
The Land Rover Range Rover IV speeds up to 100k\h by 2.7 s better in relation to the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Land Rover Range Rover IV will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
38

Trunk capacity

909 > 774 l
The boot of the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 is only 17 % bigger than the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4. However, the difference is not big it would be right to say that both cars have more of less the same trunk size.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,500 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the maximum torque is reached shows us how fast an engine achieves its full performance with increase in rotational speed. The lower rotational speed or the longer range at which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt earlier.
22

Width

2,073 > 1,890 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Land Rover Range Rover IV is 10 percent wider in relation to the Hyundai. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

827 > 708 km
19

Fuel tank

104 > 76 l
The Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV is worst that the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV in the field of fuel tank size. The Land Rover Range Rover IV is able to take by 37 percent more fuel compared with its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,926 > 2,696 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 has 9 percent longer wheelbase distance when compared to Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Land Rover should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

714 > 543 km
11

Extra-urban range

981 > 893 km
10

Number of gears

8 > 5 gears
The Land Rover has by 3 gears more compared with the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV. This significant difference provides a driver of the Land Rover Range Rover IV much more steady and also fuel efficient ride.
8

Engine capacity

2,994 > 2,657 cc
The Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV has by 337 cubic centimeters greater engine size when compared to the Hyundai Santa Fe II. This play a little role on vehicle's performance, as both values are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,999 > 4,655 mm
The Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 is 344 millimeters longer when compared to the Hyundai. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to driving comfort and space in the boot. The Land Rover probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Land Rover will be better driven but the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length .
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2012 > 2006
Production of the older car started 6 years prior to Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV hence man may suspect that this vehicle features significantly less advanced solutions .
1

Height

1,836 > 1,725 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of carrying massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 111 millimeters in favor of the Land Rover Range Rover IV is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a ride in the city, it is good to have an automatic however the choice of transmisison can have a substantial effect on fuel efficiency. Automatics may burn up from 5 to 10% more than manuals.

Hyundai

5 reasons for Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

10.6 > 12.5 l
The Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4 consumes 1.9 l less in the combined cycle when compared to the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4. The difference at the level of 1.9 l is not significant. Nevertheless in the long term it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

13.8 > 14.5 l
The Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV uses 5 % less fuel in city traffic in comparison to the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4. The Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4, which comes from large 4x4 class, consumes 1 l less petrol. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the large SUV segment equals to 14.8 l, while the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV uses by 7 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,273 > 2,031 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

8.4 > 10.7 l
0

Maximal power RPM

6,000 > 6,500 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2012 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 2,325 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK