The fuel economy is considerably to Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4's advantage. This car consumes 3.1 l less gasoline in the mixed cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV. Note that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the large 4x4 class, in which the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4 is classified, is 12.2 l whereas the Hyundai Santa Fe II uses by 13 % less amount of fuel than the average.
The fuel economy while driving inside city is considerably to the Hyundai's advantage. This automobile consumes 22 % fewer fuel in built up area than the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d. Better fuel consumption means an increase in cruising range.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A small difference that amounts to 0.8 s suggests that the Mitsubishi is the worst car of these two compared. In the „large SUV class, being represented by the Mitsubishi, the average acceleration amounts to 10.5 s and is by 3 percent higher than this of Mitsubishi car.
The trunk of the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4 is 87 percent more spacious in comparison to the Mitsubishi. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Hyundai will be much more practical. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The width of the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4 is larger only by 1 % than the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4 and is not really important. The medium for the „large SUV” segment amounts to around 1,866 mm and is by 1 percent larger than the width of the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4.
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Hyundai that can contain 8 l more fuel in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d. The medium fuel container capacity in the large SUV segment, which is represented by the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4, is 84 l, whereas in large 4x4 segment (represented by the Mitsubishi Pajero IV) it amounts to 84 l.
The Hyundai has 150 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to Mitsubishi Pajero IV. As a result the Hyundai is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
The Hyundai is 270 millimeters longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi. The length of the vehicle plays a role in respect of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Hyundai preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Hyundai Santa Fe II will be better driven but the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length .
Number of doors
There’s no doubts that the five-door Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV is more convenient and if you frequently carry more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi very often look much cooler and for young drivers who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Mitsubishi Pajero IV may be more appropriate.