Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4

Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

14 reasons for

Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d, model available from 2006.
It has 3.8 MIVEC 250HP ic petrol engine produced from 2006.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4
Hyundai

14 reasons for Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

10.6 > 13.7 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4's advantage. This car consumes 3.1 l less gasoline in the mixed cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV. Note that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the large 4x4 class, in which the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4 is classified, is 12.2 l whereas the Hyundai Santa Fe II uses by 13 % less amount of fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

13.8 > 17.7 l
The fuel economy while driving inside city is considerably to the Hyundai's advantage. This automobile consumes 22 % fewer fuel in built up area than the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d. Better fuel consumption means an increase in cruising range.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10 > 10.8 s
A small difference that amounts to 0.8 s suggests that the Mitsubishi is the worst car of these two compared. In the „large SUV class, being represented by the Mitsubishi, the average acceleration amounts to 10.5 s and is by 3 percent higher than this of Mitsubishi car.
38

Trunk capacity

774 > 415 l
The trunk of the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4 is 87 percent more spacious in comparison to the Mitsubishi. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Hyundai will be much more practical. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
24

Extra-urban consumption

8.4 > 11.2 l
22

Width

1,890 > 1,877 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The width of the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4 is larger only by 1 % than the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4 and is not really important. The medium for the „large SUV” segment amounts to around 1,866 mm and is by 1 percent larger than the width of the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4.
19

Range

708 > 511 km
19

Fuel tank

76 > 68 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Hyundai that can contain 8 l more fuel in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d. The medium fuel container capacity in the large SUV segment, which is represented by the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4, is 84 l, whereas in large 4x4 segment (represented by the Mitsubishi Pajero IV) it amounts to 84 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,696 > 2,546 mm
The Hyundai has 150 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to Mitsubishi Pajero IV. As a result the Hyundai is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
12

Urban range

543 > 390 km
11

Extra-urban range

893 > 616 km
6

Length

4,655 > 4,385 mm
The Hyundai is 270 millimeters longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi. The length of the vehicle plays a role in respect of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Hyundai preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Hyundai Santa Fe II will be better driven but the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length .
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV is more convenient and if you frequently carry more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi very often look much cooler and for young drivers who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Mitsubishi Pajero IV may be more appropriate.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4

Mitsubishi

11 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

250 > 189 hp
The Mitsubishi comes with petrol which delivers by 61 more horsepower than the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It should be googd car to those who would like to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

327 > 250 Nm
Because of 31 percent greater torque, the engine of the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Hyundai Santa Fe II. This, in turn, produces better acceleration.
33

Top speed

200 > 190 km/h
The maximum speed of the ​​Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4 is greater compared with of the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV by 5, which allows the Mitsubishi to travel quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 10 km/h is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,745 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the highest torque is delivered tells us how fast an engine reaches its best output with growth in rmp. The lower rotational speed or the wider range at which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt earlier.
8

Engine capacity

3,827 > 2,657 cc
The engine capacity of the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4 is by 44 % bigger when compared to the Hyundai. For this reason the Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d will be of better performance, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
8

Maximum load capacity

695 > 545 kg
1

Tire width

265 > 235 mm
1

Height

1,848 > 1,725 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 7 % in favor of the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For drivers who prefer more functional use of a vehicle and don’t want complications that stems from the manual transmission we recommend vehicles with automatic gearbox. For those who have a flair for sport driving a manual gearbox may be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Payload

2,910 > 2,325 kg
0

Curb weight

2,217 > 1,778 kg

Cars specifications

Hyundai Santa Fe II SUV 2.7 i V6 24V 189HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,325 kg 2,910 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK