Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4 vs Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Thien Zie Yung Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

15 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.5 DI-D 178HP diesel engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

13 reasons for

Hyundai Santa Fe III, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 CRDi 150HP diesel engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual
Mitsubishi

15 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

178 > 150 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi is 28 horsepowers grater than the Hyundai Santa Fe III. As the difference is little this should not affect the car performance extensively.
59

Maximal torque

398 > 385 Nm
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4 has 3 percent more torque in comparison to the Hyundai Santa Fe III. Although the vast majority of people do not take into account the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it informs the best how a car is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is not really big and for that reason the difference will not be much noticeable.
38

Trunk capacity

714 > 585 l
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II has 129 liters more capable boot in relation to the Hyundai Santa Fe III. Such a difference is quite relevant and it will matters when it comes to the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II has 5 percent bigger trunk capacity than the average in its segment. More spacious luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling and also while everyday car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,813 > 1,680 l
19

Fuel tank

69 > 65 l
In this category it is the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II that can hold 4 liters more fuel compared with the Hyundai Santa Fe III. The medium fuel tank capacity in the large 4x4 segment, which is represented by the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II, is 84 l, whereas in large 4x4 class (represented by the Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual) it is 84 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,806 > 2,697 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better vehicle's weight distribution. Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II has 109 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Mitsubishi should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
9

Ground clearance

217 > 185 mm
Ground clearance is the space between the car underbody and the ground. From these two cars, it is the Mitsubishi that has 17 percent higher ground clearance than the Hyundai Santa Fe III. For this reason the Mitsubishi will deal better when driving over imperfect roads and obstacles in the city. One drawback is the higher ride height means a higher center of gravity, which can adversely affect the handling of the vehicle.
8

Engine capacity

2,476 > 1,996 cc
The Mitsubishi has by 24 percent larger engine displacement when compared to the Hyundai Santa Fe III. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both figures are quite simmilar.
8

Gross trailer weight

2,499 > 2,497 kg
6

Length

4,695 > 4,687 mm
The Mitsubishi is 8 millimeters longer than the Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also have bigger trunk. While the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II seems to be better option for families or those who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Hyundai Santa Fe III may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
1

Height

1,838 > 1,678 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4, which is by 10 percent higher than the Hyundai Santa Fe III, would be better option for you. However, compared cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Payload

2,708 > 2,506 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Curb weight

2,047 > 1,706 kg

Hyundai

13 reasons for Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.1 > 8.4 l
The Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual burns up 27 percent fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II. The difference in the amount of 27 % will be very appreciable in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long term it will result in a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

8.1 > 9.8 l
The Hyundai Santa Fe III consumes 17 percent fewer petrol while driving inside city than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV. The Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual, that comes from full-size SUV segment, uses 6.7 l less diesel. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the urban for the large off-road 4x4 class equals to 14.8 l, while the Hyundai Santa Fe III uses by 45 percent less fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11 > 11.7 s
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4 accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower than the Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual. The difference in the amount of 0.7 s is not really significant and it should not be substantially taken into as important when buying one of these two vehicles.
33

Top speed

187 > 179 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Hyundai is greater in comparison to the Mitsubishi by 4, which allows the Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual to overcome faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 8 kilometers/hour is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,800 > 1,995 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached affects an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. Still, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to check a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.9 > 7.3 l
22

Width

1,885 > 1,813 mm
Distance between two sides of a car influences on interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual is widther by 72 mm than the Mitsubishi and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large SUV” segment amounts to approximately 1,866 mm and is by 1 percent smaller than the width of the Hyundai Santa Fe III.
19

Range

1,049 > 854 km
12

Urban range

790 > 714 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,306 > 959 km
8

Maximum load capacity

808 > 665 kg
4

Rear track

1,644 > 1,513 mm
0

Front track

1,636 > 1,520 mm

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4 Hyundai Santa Fe III 2.0 CRDi 150HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 2,499 kg 2,497 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK