Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual vs Hyundai ix35 SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

14 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 MIVEC 117HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Hyundai ix35 SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 GDI 135HP petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Hyundai ix35 SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual
Mitsubishi

14 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117KM manual in comparison to Hyundai ix35 SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

6.2 > 6.8 l
The Mitsubishi uses 0.6 l fewer in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Hyundai ix35. The difference at the level of 0.6 l is not realy noticeable. Nevertheless during a longer period of time it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
54

Urban consumption

7.8 > 8.2 l
The fuel consumption of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 l smaller when compared to the Hyundai. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long term it may cause that the car would be significantly less expensive to exploate.
29

Maximal torque RPM

3,995 > 4,850 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is produced has an impact on an engine’s performance. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always good to analyze a torque graph.
28

Top speed

183 > 178 km/h
The top velocity of the Mitsubishi is greater in comparison to this of the Hyundai which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 3 percent is not big and is imperceptible in everyday use.
23

Extra-urban consumption

5 > 6 l
20

Fuel tank

62 > 59 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Mitsubishi which can comprise 5 % more fuel compared with the Hyundai ix35. The average fuel container capacity in the small off-road 4x4 class, from which the Mitsubishi comes from, amounts to 61 liters, whereas in mini 4x4 segment (represented by the Hyundai) it amounts to 61 l.
16

Wheelbase

2,676 > 2,638 mm
Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual has 1 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Hyundai ix35 SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, cars with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
16

Range

1,050 > 853 km
12

Urban range

808 > 707 km
8

Ground clearance

171 > 169 mm
Ground clearance is the gap between the car underbody and the road. As far as the two compared vehicles are concerned, it is the Mitsubishi ASX that has 2 millimeters higher ride height than the Hyundai ix35 SUV. This is why the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual will cope better when driving over imperfect roads and obstacles in the city. However, the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can adversely affect the handling of the Mitsubishi ASX.
8

Extra-urban range

1,260 > 967 km
7

Maximum load capacity

625 > 525 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

6,000 > 6,300 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,869 > 1,830 kg
Advantages

cabin noise

db

Hyundai

12 reasons for Hyundai ix35 SUV 1.6 GDI 135KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

135 > 117 hp
The horsepower of the Hyundai ix35 SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual is by 18 horsepowers grater in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. As the difference is not big it should not affect the car performance to a large extent.
47

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.1 > 11.4 s
The Mitsubishi accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower than the Hyundai ix35 SUV. The difference at the level of 3 percent is not really significant and it should not be strongly taken into consideration when selecting the better one of presented vehicles.
36

Trunk capacity

464 > 418 l
The boot of the Hyundai is only 11 % bigger than the Mitsubishi ASX. However, the difference is so little that it would be fair to say that both cars have similar boot capacity.
20

Width

1,816 > 1,770 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The Hyundai ix35 is widther by 46 millimeters than the Mitsubishi ASX and is not really relevant. The average for the „compact SUV” class equals to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 19 millimeters larger than the same attribute of the Hyundai ix35.
9

Length

4,409 > 4,296 mm
The Hyundai is 3 percent longer in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. The length of the vehicle is significant in respect of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Hyundai ix35 probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Hyundai ix35 will be better driven but the Mitsubishi will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length .
7

Gross trailer weight

1,200 > 1,102 kg
4

Engine capacity

1,592 > 1,589 cc
The Hyundai ix35 SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual has by 3 cc greater engine size in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. This play a little role in terms of acceleration, as both values does not vary much.
3

Rear track

1,592 > 1,525 mm
2

Height

1,660 > 1,615 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Hyundai ix35, which is by 45 millimeters higher than the Mitsubishi ASX SUV, is better option for you. However, presented cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

754 > 746 kg
0

Front track

1,588 > 1,525 mm
0

Curb weight

1,300 > 1,240 kg

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual Hyundai ix35 SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,102 kg 1,200 kg
    Model release date 2010 2010
    Price range popular popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK