Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 vs Isuzu Amigo II 2.2 130HP

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

8 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Isuzu Amigo II, model available from 1998 to 2003.
It has 2.2 130HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2003.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Isuzu Amigo II 2.2 130HP
Mitsubishi

8 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Isuzu Amigo II 2.2 130HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 130 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I that has by 40 more horsepower in relation to the Isuzu. As a result the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I will achieve higher maximum speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I will as well give seemingly more flexiblility in specific gears.
15

Wheelbase

2,725 > 2,460 mm
The wheelbase of a car means the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 has 265 mm longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Isuzu Amigo II 2.2 130HP. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
8

Engine capacity

2,971 > 2,199 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I is by 35 % bigger than the Isuzu Amigo II 2.2 130HP. As a result the Isuzu will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I will be of better quality, working more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,610 > 4,262 mm
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 is 8 percent longer when compared to the Isuzu Amigo II. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases have more storage space. While the Mitsubishi seems to be better for families or those who love the idea of comfortable rides, the Isuzu Amigo II may be more appropriate to women as it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Mitsubishi is more usable and if you frequently carry more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Isuzu Amigo II 2.2 130HP very often look much cooler and for young drivers who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Isuzu Amigo II 2.2 130HP may be better one.
1

Height

1,720 > 1,692 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, which is by 2 % higher than the Isuzu Amigo II, is better choice for you. However, these two cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a smooth drive in the city, it is good to have an automatic but the choice of transmisison may have a big effect on fuel consumption. Automatics may use about from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2003

Isuzu

4 reasons for Isuzu Amigo II 2.2 130KM in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
22

Width

1,790 > 1,695 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability on road. The Isuzu is widther by 6 % compared with the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large off-road 4x4” class amounts to approximately 1,866 millimeters and is by 4 percent smaller than the width of the Isuzu.
4

Rear track

1,518 > 1,434 mm
1

Model release date

1998 > 1996
Given that the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I was introduced only 2 years earlier than the Isuzu, the distance in technology used in both vehicles is not really big, however, the Isuzu Amigo II may have a bit more new solutions used in it.
0

Front track

1,514 > 1,422 mm

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 Isuzu Amigo II 2.2 130HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    End of model sale 2008 2003
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK