Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual vs Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

19 reasons for

Isuzu Axiom, model available from 2001 to 2004.
It has 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2004.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

6 reasons for

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, model available from 2005.
It has 1.6 i 16V 106HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
Isuzu

19 reasons for Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

233 > 106 hp
The Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual is significantly more dynamic than the Isuzu Axiom because it has by o 120 percent grater horsepower. The characteristic of this vehicle will give you more experience of travelling this car.
38

Trunk capacity

996 > 186 l
The boot of the Isuzu Axiom is 435 % more spacious in relation to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual will be a way more convenient. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can take.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,420 > 2,067 l
33

Top speed

180 > 160 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Isuzu Axiom is greater than the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 by 13, which allows the Isuzu to overcome faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 20 kilometers per hour is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
19

Fuel tank

74 > 55 l
In this category it is the Isuzu which can hold 19 liters more fuel than the Suzuki. The medium fuel tank capacity in the compact SUV class, from which the Isuzu comes from, amounts to 61 l, whereas in small off-road 4x4 segment (represented by the Suzuki) it is 61 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,703 > 2,636 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual has 3 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Suzuki. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

3,493 > 1,587 cc
Obviously the Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual wins in the category of {engine capacity. The difference amounts to 1,906 cubic centimeters than the Suzuki. It is interesting that in „compact SUV” segment, from which the Isuzu comes from, the average engine capacity is 2,104 cc and the biggest engine capacity in this class amounts to 4,201 .
8

Maximum load capacity

427 > 425 kg
6

Length

4,634 > 4,467 mm
The Isuzu Axiom is 167 millimeters longer in relation to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. Long vehicles more of passenger space and usually provide bigger trunk. Although the Isuzu Axiom occurs to be better for families or persons who value comfortable rides, the Suzuki Grand Vitara II may appeal to singles as it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a upgraded construction of a straight engine which according to us is {a better one. Engine of V configuration installed inside a vehicle the Isuzu gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime can contain high numbers of cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Better engine work and pleasant sound is to driving fans certainly to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Height

1,708 > 1,695 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual, which is by 1 percent higher than the Suzuki, is appropriate pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

235 > 225 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,400 > 5,900 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,251 > 1,828 kg
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,823 > 1,405 kg

Suzuki

6 reasons for Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

10.2 > 14.7 l
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II consumes 31 percent less gasoline in city traffic in comparison to the Isuzu. The difference in the amount of 4.5 l is quite noticeable in everyday use of the vehicle. Moreover, in a long run it will bring you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may vary depending on how dynamic you drive
22

Width

1,810 > 1,796 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV is widther by 14 mm in relation to the Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual and is not really important. The medium for the „compact SUV” class amounts to 1,797 millimeters and is by 1 % larger than the width of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV.
12

Urban range

539 > 503 km
4

Rear track

1,570 > 1,520 mm
1

Model release date

2005 > 2001
Given that the Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual was launched only 4 years prior to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, the distance in technology used in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 might have a bit more new solutions used in it.
0

Front track

1,540 > 1,515 mm

Cars specifications

Isuzu Axiom 3.5 i V6 24V 2WD 233HP manual Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2001 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,251 kg 1,828 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK