Mitsubishi Eclipse III Cabrio 2.4 i 16V 149HP manual vs Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173HP

Mitsubishi Eclipse III Cabrio 2.4 i 16V 149HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Matio Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

9 reasons for

Mitsubishi Eclipse III Cabrio, model available from 1999 to 2005.
It has 2.4 i 16V 149HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2005.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio, model available from 1968 to 1971.
It has 4.2 173HP petrol engine produced from 1968 to 1971.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173HP
Mitsubishi

9 reasons for Mitsubishi Eclipse III Cabrio 2.4 i 16V 149KM manual in comparison to Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173HP

Reasons for
22

Width

1,755 > 1,656 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The width of the Mitsubishi Eclipse III is larger only by 6 percent than the Jaguar E-Type II and is not really worth considering. The average for the ā€žSā€ class amounts to around 1,791 mm and is by 2 % bigger than the width of the Mitsubishi.
15

Wheelbase

2,556 > 2,430 mm
Mitsubishi Eclipse III has 5 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, cars with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
6

Length

4,490 > 4,453 mm
The Mitsubishi Eclipse III Cabrio 2.4 i 16V 149HP manual is 37 millimeters longer than the Jaguar. The length of the car is significant in terms of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Mitsubishi Eclipse III Cabrio 2.4 i 16V 149HP manual probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi Eclipse III will be better driven ,however, the Jaguar E-Type II will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,507 > 1,270 mm
1

Height

1,341 > 1,219 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Mitsubishi Eclipse III, which is by 10 % higher than the Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio, is appropriate choice for you. However, presented cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
1

Model release date

1999 > 1968
0

Number of seats

4 > 2
0

Front track

1,508 > 1,270 mm
0

End of model sale

2005 > 1971

Jaguar

3 reasons for Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173KM in comparison to Mitsubishi Eclipse III Cabrio 2.4 i 16V 149HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

173 > 149 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Jaguar E-Type II which has by 24 horsepower more than the Mitsubishi Eclipse III, which makes this vehicle somewhat better in terms of high speed. Due to more horsepower the Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173HP should as well give a bit better flexiblility in specific gears.
19

Fuel tank

65 > 61 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Jaguar which can contain 4 liters more fuel in comparison to the Mitsubishi Eclipse III Cabrio. The average fuel container capacity in the S segment, from which the Jaguar comes from, equals 68 l, whereas in sports cars segment (represented by the Mitsubishi Eclipse III Cabrio 2.4 i 16V 149HP manual) it equals 68 l.
3

Price range

luxury > popular

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Eclipse III Cabrio 2.4 i 16V 149HP manual Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173HP
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 1999 1968
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload 2,038 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK