Toyota Celica VI Cabrio 2.2 i GT 136HP manual vs Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173HP

Toyota Celica VI Cabrio 2.2 i GT 136HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

8 reasons for

Toyota Celica VI Cabrio, model available from 1993 to 1999.
It has 2.2 i GT 136HP petrol engine produced from 1994 to 1999.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio, model available from 1968 to 1971.
It has 4.2 173HP petrol engine produced from 1968 to 1971.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173HP
Toyota

8 reasons for Toyota Celica VI Cabrio 2.2 i GT 136KM manual in comparison to Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173HP

Reasons for
22

Width

1,750 > 1,656 mm
distance between left and right side of a car affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability while driving. The Toyota Celica VI Cabrio 2.2 i GT 136HP manual is widther only by 94 millimeters than the Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio and is not really important. The average for the ā€žSā€ class equals to around 1,791 millimeters and is by 2 % smaller than the width of the Toyota Celica VI Cabrio 2.2 i GT 136HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,530 > 2,430 mm
Toyota Celica VI Cabrio 2.2 i GT 136HP manual has 4 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173HP. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
6

Length

4,505 > 4,453 mm
The Toyota Celica VI Cabrio 2.2 i GT 136HP manual is 52 millimeters longer in relation to the Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and usually provide bigger trunk. Although the Toyota occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who value soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Jaguar may be more appropriate to the young as it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,491 > 1,270 mm
1

Height

1,324 > 1,219 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of loading big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 105 millimeters in favor of the Toyota Celica VI is small and should not be really noticeable.
1

Model release date

1993 > 1968
0

Front track

1,510 > 1,270 mm
0

End of model sale

1999 > 1971

Jaguar

3 reasons for Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173KM in comparison to Toyota Celica VI Cabrio 2.2 i GT 136HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

173 > 136 hp
The Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio is equipped with petrol which delivers by 37 more horsepower than the the engine of the Toyota Celica VI Cabrio 2.2 i GT 136HP manual, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It should be better choice for drivers who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
19

Fuel tank

65 > 61 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173HP which can hold 7 % more fuel in comparison to the Toyota Celica VI. The average fuel tank size in the S class, from which the Jaguar E-Type II comes from, equals 68 liters, whereas in S class (represented by the Toyota) it is 68 liters.
3

Price range

luxury > popular

Cars specifications

Toyota Celica VI Cabrio 2.2 i GT 136HP manual Jaguar E-Type II Cabrio 4.2 173HP
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 1993 1968
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    End of model sale 1999 1971
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK