The fuel consumption (urban) is considerably to the Mazda 6 III Estate's advantage. This automobile consumes 5.9 l less fuel running around the town when compared to the Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.1 i V6 24V Sport 156HP manual. Better fuel consumption equals less fuel cost passed on you.
If you need a car for long travels, which could hold more things in the boot , take the Mazda. The Jaguar is equiped with by 61 l smaller boot in comparison to the Jaguar X-Type so you would be able to load a bit less. Assessing the boot pay attention to its dimensions which have notable effect on loading possibility .
Trunk capacity with seats down
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mazda is 3 percent wider in comparison to the Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.1 i V6 24V Sport 156HP manual. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
The Mazda 6 III has 2 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Jaguar X-Type. Thanks to this the Mazda 6 III Estate is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
The Mazda is 90 millimeters longer when compared to the Jaguar X-Type. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Mazda 6 III Estate will be better driven ,however, the Jaguar X-Type will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
Number of gears
The Mazda have a higher gear count compared to the Jaguar X-Type which means
that Mazda 6 III would achieve
faster acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is not big and unless you are drag
racer at a timed event you would not even
observe the difference.
Model release date
Manufacture of the older car commenced 11 years prior to its contender and for this reason it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle features significantly less modern solutions used.