Jaguar XJS III Cabrio 4.0 222HP vs Nissan 300ZX Z 32 3.0 Twin Turbo 283HP manual

Jaguar XJS III Cabrio 4.0 222HP

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

8 reasons for

Jaguar XJS III Cabrio, model available from 1990 to 1996.
It has 4.0 222HP petrol engine produced from 1991 to 1994.
Drive has manual gearbox.

4 reasons for

Nissan 300ZX Z 32, model available from 1990 to 2000.
It has 3.0 Twin Turbo 283HP petrol engine produced from 1990 to 2000.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Nissan 300ZX Z 32 3.0 Twin Turbo 283HP manual
Jaguar

8 reasons for Jaguar XJS III Cabrio 4.0 222KM in comparison to Nissan 300ZX Z 32 3.0 Twin Turbo 283HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

407 > 326 l
With more boot size the Jaguar XJS III will have much more room for loading things and be more functional one than the Nissan 300ZX Z 32. If the capacity of the boot is appeals to you, the Jaguar XJS III will be better to buy because it is about 25 percent larger than the trunk of its rival.
22

Width

1,793 > 1,790 mm
Width of a car influences on room in the cabin as well as stability during driving. The Jaguar XJS III Cabrio 4.0 222HP is widther by 3 millimeters than the Nissan and is not really worth considering. The medium for the ā€žSā€ segment amounts to 1,791 mm and is by 2 mm larger than the same feature of the Jaguar.
19

Fuel tank

90 > 69 l
The Nissan 300ZX Z 32 gives way to the Jaguar in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Jaguar XJS III is able to take by 30 percent more fuel in relation to its rival.
15

Wheelbase

2,593 > 2,450 mm
Jaguar XJS III Cabrio has 143 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Nissan 300ZX Z 32. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
6

Length

4,817 > 4,305 mm
The Jaguar XJS III Cabrio is 12 percent longer in relation to the Nissan. The length of the car plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Jaguar XJS III Cabrio probably will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Jaguar XJS III will be better driven ,however, the Nissan will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length .
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,275 > 1,243 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Jaguar XJS III Cabrio 4.0 222HP, which is by 32 mm higher than the Nissan 300ZX Z 32 3.0 Twin Turbo 283HP manual, is better choice for you. However, these two cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Number of seats

4 > 2

Nissan

4 reasons for Nissan 300ZX Z 32 3.0 Twin Turbo 283KM manual in comparison to Jaguar XJS III Cabrio 4.0 222HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

283 > 222 hp
The Nissan has 61 hp more horsepower than Jaguar XJS III Cabrio 4.0 222HP. The Nissan will be distinctly quicker speed up thanks to grater horsepower. Also leaving behind other vehicles should be a piece of cake for a vehicle equipped with more powerful motor.
4

Rear track

1,555 > 1,507 mm
0

Front track

1,495 > 1,490 mm
0

End of model sale

2000 > 1996

Cars specifications

Jaguar XJS III Cabrio 4.0 222HP Nissan 300ZX Z 32 3.0 Twin Turbo 283HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 1990 1990
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - Z32
    Class S S
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK