Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4 vs Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic

Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

11 reasons for

Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio, model available from 2001.
It has 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Jaguar XK II Cabrio, model available from 2006.
It has 4.2 300HP ic petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic
Lamborghini

11 reasons for Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

580 > 300 hp
The Lamborghini has 93 % more horsepower in comparison to Jaguar XK II. The Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio will be distinctly quicker accelerate thanks to bigger amout of horses under its hoot. Also getting ahead of other vehicles should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with stronger engine.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

3.9 > 6.3 s
If a dynamic driving is what you realy like, the Lamborghini is better for you as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 38 percent faster than the Jaguar XK II Cabrio.
33

Top speed

330 > 250 km/h
The Jaguar XK II Cabrio has 32 percent lower top speed in comparison to the Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4, consequently driving a long route, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will need more time. The difference may be noticeable during running over on the road without speed limits to the vehicle of Lamborghini brand advantage.
22

Width

2,045 > 1,892 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle influences on room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4 is widther by 153 mm than the Jaguar and is not really important. The average for the „sports cars” segment equals to around 1,791 millimeters and is by 14 % smaller than the same feature of the Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio.
19

Fuel tank

100 > 72 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the category of fuel tank capacity is Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4 that is able to carry by 28 l more fuel in comparison to the Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic.
14

Cylinders

12 > 8
8

Engine capacity

6,191 > 4,197 cc
The engine size of the Lamborghini Murcielago is by 1,994 cc bigger than the Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic. In a consequence the Jaguar will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Lamborghini will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
3

Price range

supersport > luxury
1

Tire width

335 > 275 mm
0

Valves

48 > 32
0

Tire profile

30 > 40 %

Jaguar

10 reasons for Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300KM automat in comparison to Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

17.2 > 32.6 l
The Jaguar burns up 47 percent less petrol while driving inside city in comparison to the Lamborghini Murcielago. The difference in the amount of 15.4 l is really perceptible in everyday use of the vehicle. But, in a long term it will bring you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may change depending on how dynamic you drive
38

Trunk capacity

312 > 140 l
The boot of the Jaguar is 172 l more spacious in comparison to the Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Jaguar will be much more useful. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can transport.
15

Wheelbase

2,752 > 2,673 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Jaguar has 79 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

413 > 307 km
6

Length

4,791 > 4,578 mm
The Jaguar XK II is 5 percent longer in comparison to the Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4. The length of the vehicle is significant in respect of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Jaguar XK II Cabrio probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Jaguar XK II will be better driven but the Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4 will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length .
1

Model release date

2006 > 2001
The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 5 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Jaguar may feature more advanced technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,330 > 1,004 mm
The Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic is by 326 mm higher than the Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio. Thanks to this the Jaguar is better for getting in and out of the it and gives impression of more safety when siting high behind the wheel. This also guarantees good visibility . The Jaguar is surely more convenient for families but we do not recommend it to drivers who are looking for fast driving and sporting thrill.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic transmission installed in the Jaguar XK II despite having a few minuses gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city you probably would be less tired. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

6,000 > 7,500 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,037 > 2,000 kg

Cars specifications

Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4 Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic
    Price range supersport luxury
    Model release date 2001 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload 2,000 kg 2,037 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK