Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic vs Nissan 350Z Cabrio 3.5 i V6 24V 283HP manual

Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

15 reasons for

Jaguar XK II Cabrio, model available from 2006.
It has 4.2 300HP ic petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

2 reasons for

Nissan 350Z Cabrio, model available from 2003 to 2008.
It has 3.5 i V6 24V 283HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2007.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan 350Z Cabrio 3.5 i V6 24V 283HP manual
Jaguar

15 reasons for Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300KM automat in comparison to Nissan 350Z Cabrio 3.5 i V6 24V 283HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

300 > 283 hp
The horsepower of the Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic is 17 horsepowers grater when compared to the Nissan 350Z Cabrio 3.5 i V6 24V 283HP manual. As the difference is not big it should not affect the car performance in a noticeable way.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

6.3 > 6.4 s
A little difference amounts to 2 percent shows that the Nissan 350Z is somewhat beaten in this confrontation. In the „sports cars” segment, to which the Nissan 350Z Cabrio 3.5 i V6 24V 283HP manual is assigned, the average acceleration is 7.2 s and is by 11 % slower than acceleration of Nissan’s car.
22

Width

1,892 > 1,815 mm
distance between left and right side of a car influences on room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The width of the Jaguar XK II is larger only by 77 millimeters in comparison to the Nissan and is not really relevant. The medium for the „S” segment equals to 1,791 millimeters and is by 101 millimeters smaller than the width of the Jaguar.
15

Wheelbase

2,752 > 2,649 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Jaguar XK II has 4 % longer wheelbase distance than Nissan 350Z Cabrio. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

4,197 > 3,499 cc
The Jaguar has by 20 percent greater engine capacity in relation to the Nissan. This play a little role on vehicle's performance, as both values does not differ much.
6

Length

4,791 > 4,307 mm
The Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic is 11 percent longer in relation to the Nissan 350Z Cabrio 3.5 i V6 24V 283HP manual. Long cars are more spacious and usually have bigger trunk. While the Jaguar XK II occurs to be better option for families or persons who value convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Nissan 350Z Cabrio 3.5 i V6 24V 283HP manual may be more appropriate to the young as it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2006 > 2003
The difference in debut day between presented cars is only 3 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Jaguar XK II may feature more advanced technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Tire width

275 > 225 mm
1

Height

1,330 > 1,328 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of carrying big amount of luggage to it. The difference of 2 mm in favor of the Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic is little and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox installed in the Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic despite having a few disadvantages gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel the driver is more rested. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of changing gears in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

6,000 > 6,200 revolutions/minute
0

Valves

32 > 24
0

Tire profile

40 > 45 %

Nissan

2 reasons for Nissan 350Z Cabrio 3.5 i V6 24V 283KM manual in comparison to Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic

Reasons for
19

Fuel tank

79 > 72 l
The Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic is worst that the Nissan 350Z in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Nissan 350Z is able to take by 10 percent more fuel than its rival.
0

Curb weight

1,635 > 1,598 kg

Cars specifications

Jaguar XK II Cabrio 4.2 300HP automatic Nissan 350Z Cabrio 3.5 i V6 24V 283HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2006 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload 2,037 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK