Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118HP manual

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

17 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Jeep Cherokee II, model available from 1987 to 2001.
It has 2.5 i 118HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2001.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118HP manual
Nissan

17 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 15.6 l
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual burns up of 8.7 l fuel less while driving inside city than the Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118HP manual. The Nissan Qashqai II, as a representative of small off-road 4x4 segment, consumes 2.7 l/100Km fewer than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “mini 4x4” class equals to 9.6 l of fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.3 > 13 s
The Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118HP manual can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II. The difference in the amount of 1.7 s is quite low and for that reason it should not be substantially taken by you into as important for buying one of compared cars.
33

Top speed

183 > 165 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is greater than this of the Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118HP manual by 11, which allows the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual to travel faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 18 kilometers per hour is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,800 > 1,760 mm
Distance between two sides of a car influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability during driving. The width of the Nissan Qashqai II is larger by 2 percent than the Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118HP manual and is not really relevant. The average for the „compact SUV” class amounts to around 1,797 mm and is by 3 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,584 mm
The Nissan Qashqai II has 2 percent longer wheelbase when compared to Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118HP manual. Therefore the Nissan Qashqai II is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Urban range

797 > 487 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan has a one additional gear than the Jeep. Most often this extra speed is a taller one so that the previous speeds can be shorter in order to allow better performance in the lower speeds. One more speed also have an effect on decreasing fuel consumption and CO2 output.
6

Length

4,380 > 4,200 mm
The Nissan Qashqai II is 4 percent longer in comparison to the Jeep. Long cars are more spacious and also have more storage space. While the Nissan Qashqai II occurs to be better for families or persons who appreciate convenient rides, the Jeep may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,563 > 1,447 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Nissan Qashqai II is more convenient and if you frequently travel with more than one people then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Jeep generally look more dynamic and sporty and for those who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Jeep Cherokee II may be better one.
1

Model release date

2014 > 1987
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,200 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,448 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 75 %

Jeep

7 reasons for Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118KM manual in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

118 > 115 hp
The horsepower of the Jeep Cherokee II is 3 percent grater than the Nissan Qashqai II. Because the difference is little this should not affect the car performance extensively.
38

Trunk capacity

654 > 438 l
With more trunk space the Jeep Cherokee II will have much more room for transporting things and be more usefull car compared with the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is important to you, the Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118HP manual will be better to buy as it is around 216 l larger than the boot of its competitor.
19

Fuel tank

77 > 54 l
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank capacity is Jeep which can hold by 43 percent more petrol in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II.
8

Engine capacity

2,465 > 1,198 cc
The Jeep Cherokee II has 106 percent bigger engine displacement in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II. Such a huge difference causes that comparision of this values is aimless. The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual seems to be the right choice for drivers who apreciate lower fuel consumption and car operating costs at the expense of slower driving, however, those who decided to buy the Jeep Cherokee II should benefit from better power, durability, smoothness of the engine and consequently better joy when driving.
1

Height

1,630 > 1,590 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of loading big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 3 % to the advantage of the Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118HP manual is not big and does not matter much.
0

Payload

2,110 > 1,860 kg
0

Curb weight

1,514 > 1,314 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Jeep Cherokee II 2.5 i 118HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2014 1987
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK