Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.5 dCi 110HP manual

Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

13 reasons for

Jeep Cherokee IV, model available from 2008 to 2013.
It has 2.8 CRD 200HP diesel engine produced from 2008 to 2013.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.5 dCi 110HP diesel engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Qashqai II 1.5 dCi 110HP manual
Jeep

13 reasons for Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200KM manual in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.5 dCi 110HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

200 > 110 hp
The Jeep is equipped with diesel which makes by 90 more horsepower than the Nissan Qashqai II, transforming the car to a much more sporty character. It seems to be better option for drivers who would like to feel thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

412 > 260 Nm
The Jeep has 152 newton meters more torque than the Nissan. Although a large number of people do not take into account the maximum torque when choosing a vehicle, it shows the best how a vehicle acclerates. When it comes to compared vehicles the difference is substantial and for that reason the Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual will deliver you better sensation of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.5 > 12.4 s
A little difference in the amount of 0.9 s shows that the Nissan Qashqai II is the worst car of these two . In the „small off-road 4x4 class, being represented by the Nissan Qashqai II, the average acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 14 % higher than this of Nissan vehicle.
15

Wheelbase

2,694 > 2,644 mm
Jeep Cherokee IV has 50 mm longer wheelbase than the Nissan Qashqai II. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
8

Engine capacity

2,769 > 1,462 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Jeep Cherokee IV is by 1,307 cc greater in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II. In a consequence the Nissan will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual will be of better quality, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
8

Maximum load capacity

560 > 545 kg
8

Gross trailer weight

2,801 > 1,349 kg
6

Length

4,489 > 4,380 mm
The Jeep Cherokee IV is 109 mm longer in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.5 dCi 110HP manual. The length of the car is important in terms of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Jeep Cherokee IV preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Jeep Cherokee IV will be better driven but the Nissan Qashqai II will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length .
1

Height

1,804 > 1,590 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of loading big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 13 % in favor of the Jeep Cherokee IV is small and does not matter much.
1

Tire width

235 > 215 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

2,600 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,535 > 1,910 kg
0

Curb weight

1,984 > 1,361 kg

Nissan

8 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.5 dCi 110KM manual in comparison to Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

3.8 > 8.6 l
The fuel economy of the Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual is quite low compared with the Nissan. The difference at the level of 56 % makes the Nissan Qashqai II 1.5 dCi 110HP manual wiser option in terms of high prices of fuel .
38

Trunk capacity

438 > 419 l
If you need a vehicles for long travels, which could contain more luggage , decide to buy the Nissan Qashqai II 1.5 dCi 110HP manual. The Jeep Cherokee IV has by 5 % smaller boot in relation to the Jeep Cherokee IV so you would be able to carry one little suitcase less. Assessing the boot also pay attention to its width length and height which have substantial impact on loading possibility .
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,755 > 2,000 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is produced determines an engine’s performance. However, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is worth to check a torque performance graph.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.5 dCi 110HP manual have a higher speed count compared to the Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual which means that Nissan should achieve better speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racing at a timed event you would not even notice the difference.
4

Rear track

1,563 > 1,549 mm
1

Model release date

2014 > 2008
Production of the older car commenced much more earlier than Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual thus it seems to be right to assume that this car has significantly less modern technologies used.
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,550 mm
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Cars specifications

Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual Nissan Qashqai II 1.5 dCi 110HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 2,801 kg 1,349 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2008 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK