Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual vs Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

13 reasons for

Volvo XC60 SUV, model available from 2008.
It has 2.0 D3 136HP diesel engine produced from 2012 to 2013.
Drive has manual gearbox.

7 reasons for

Jeep Cherokee IV, model available from 2008 to 2013.
It has 2.8 CRD 200HP diesel engine produced from 2008 to 2013.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual
Volvo

13 reasons for Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136KM manual in comparison to Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 8.6 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Volvo XC60 SUV's advantage. This vehicle burns 3 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle when compared with the Jeep Cherokee IV. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the mini 4x4 segment, in which the Volvo XC60 SUV is classified, is 7.5 l while the Volvo XC60 SUV uses by 25 % less amount of fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.2 > 11.5 s
A little difference in the amount of 0.3 s shows that the Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual is the worst vehicle of these two compared. In the „small off-road 4x4 class, being represented by the Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.9 s and is by 0.6 s higher than this of Jeep vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

495 > 419 l
The Volvo XC60 has 76 liters larger boot in comparison to the Jeep Cherokee IV. Such a difference is significant therefore it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Volvo XC60 SUV has 11 % bigger boot size than the average in the same class. More spacious luggage compartment will be useful during family journeys as well as during everyday car’s usage.
33

Top speed

190 > 180 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Volvo XC60 SUV is higher in comparison to this of the Jeep which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 10 kilometers per hour is not big and is not realy noticable in daily use.
15

Wheelbase

2,775 > 2,694 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual has 81 mm longer wheelbase distance than Jeep Cherokee IV. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
9

Ground clearance

231 > 196 mm
Ground clearance is the minimum distance between the car body and the ground. As for these two cars, it is the Volvo that has 18 % higher ride height when compared with the Jeep Cherokee IV. This is why the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual will deal better in difficult terrain and high curbs in the city. One drawback is the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can adversely influence the handling of the vehicle.
6

Length

4,629 > 4,489 mm
The Volvo XC60 SUV is 3 % longer in comparison to the Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Volvo XC60 very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual will be better driven but the Jeep will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,586 > 1,549 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Front track

1,635 > 1,550 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,120 > 2,101 mm
0

Rear overhang

942 > 1,056 mm

Jeep

7 reasons for Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200KM manual in comparison to Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

200 > 136 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Jeep Cherokee IV which has by 64 more horsepower in comparison to the Volvo XC60. Consequently the Jeep Cherokee IV will reach higher top speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual will as well provide seemingly better flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

412 > 350 Nm
Maximum torque of the Jeep is 18 percent higher than the Volvo XC60. For this reason, the Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual will accelerate slightly faster and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also cause that the Jeep will consume on average less fuel for every 100 km.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,000 > 2,250 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is produced has an impact on an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. Still, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always recommended to analyze a torque graph.
8

Engine capacity

2,769 > 1,985 cc
The Jeep Cherokee IV has 39 % greater cubic capacity in comparison to the Volvo. The difference is relatively big. As a result the Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand greater engine size equals worst fuel efficiency.
1

Height

1,804 > 1,714 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Jeep Cherokee IV, which is by 5 % higher than the Volvo, would be appropriate choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

2,600 > 3,500 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

742 > 911 mm

Cars specifications

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual Jeep Cherokee IV 2.8 CRD 200HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 2,801 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2008 2008
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK