Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Kirakiraouji Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

15 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Jeep Cherokee V, model available from 2014.
It has 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP ic petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4
Land Rover

15 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.5 > 10 l
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d consumes 1.5 l fewer in the mixed cycle when compared to the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4. The difference at the level of 1.5 l is not perceptible. At the same time in the long term it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

338 > 317 Nm
Maximum torque of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 7 percent greater than the Jeep Cherokee V. For this reason, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d will accelerate a little bit better and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also make that the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will use fever fuel for every 100 km.
56

Urban consumption

11.7 > 13.9 l
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d uses of 2.2 l fuel fewer running around the town than the Jeep Cherokee V. The Land Rover, which is classified in compact SUV class, consumes 2.1 l/100Km more than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “compact SUV” segment is 9.6 l per 100 km.
33

Top speed

217 > 180 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Land Rover is greater compared with the Jeep by 37 kilometers per hour, which allows the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque to overcome faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 21 % is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly indicates that the winner is is the one of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The engine of the Jeep reaches its full efficiency at 4,300 revolutions per minute which is by 59 percent lower compared with the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.9 > 7.7 l
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d has a one additional gear than the Jeep Cherokee V. Usually the extra gear is used as an overdrive so that the previous speeds can be shorter to allow increased performance in the lower gears. One more speed also will contribute to smaller fuel consumption and CO2 output.
9

Ground clearance

217 > 201 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in many important characteristics of a car. It is very important in SUV cars still all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Land Rover has 8 percent larger clearance when compared with the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4. Apart from effective mobility in rough terrain, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will also be easier to overcome city obstacles like high curbs, for example.
8

Maximum load capacity

710 > 399 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

745 > 446 kg
0

Front track

1,625 > 1,589 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 12

Jeep

9 reasons for Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

272 > 240 hp
The horsepower of the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 is 13 percent bigger in relation to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d. Because the difference is small it should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
15

Wheelbase

2,698 > 2,667 mm
The Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 has 1 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Land Rover. Consequently the Jeep Cherokee V is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

3,240 > 1,998 cc
The Jeep Cherokee V has 62 percent larger engine capacity in relation to the Land Rover. The difference is relatively big. For this reason the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand bigger engine displacement means worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

5,621 > 4,365 mm
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d by o 29 percent, thatks to which it is much more easier to maneuver in narrow jammed cities. In the „mini 4x4” segment, in which the car of Land Rover manufacturer is classified, the average length amounts to 4,341 mm and is by 24 millimeters shorter than the length of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a upgraded version of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which as far as we are concerned is wiser to choose one. Engine of V characteristic in a the Jeep produces more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime can contain more cylinders in a smaller package. A Better engine work and pleasant sound is to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Model release date

2014 > 2011
The difference in release date between these two cars is only 3 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Jeep Cherokee V may feature more modern technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
0

Payload

2,432 > 2,348 kg
0

Curb weight

2,033 > 1,636 kg

Cars specifications

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,796 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2011 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK