Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

14 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

13 reasons for

Jeep Cherokee V, model available from 2014.
It has 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP ic petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4
Nissan

14 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

5.6 > 10 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual's advantage. This automobile consumes 44 % fewer petrol in the mixed cycle in relation to the Jeep Cherokee V. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the mini 4x4 class, in which the Nissan is classified, is 7.5 l while the Nissan Qashqai II needs by 25 % less amount of fuel than the average.
54

Urban consumption

6.9 > 13.9 l
The Nissan Qashqai II burns 50 percent less fuel in the city compared with the Jeep. The difference at the level of 7 l is very big in using vehicle. Additionally, within many months it will give real and noticeable cost savings. Also bear in mind that presented results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably raised if you ride dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so huge that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
29

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is this of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. The engine of the Jeep Cherokee V reaches its full efficiency at 4,300 revolutions/minute which is by 2,295 revolutions per minute worst result than the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual.
28

Top speed

183 > 180 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Nissan is greater in comparison to of the Jeep Cherokee V by 3 kilometers/hour, which allows the Nissan Qashqai II to cover faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 kilometers per hour is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
23

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 7.7 l
16

Range

982 > 600 km
12

Urban range

797 > 432 km
9

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual has only one additional gear in relation to the Jeep Cherokee V. Most often this additional speed is used as an overdrive thanks to which the previous speeds can be shorter in order to allow better performance in the lower speeds. One more speed as well will contribute to smaller fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
8

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 779 km
7

Maximum load capacity

542 > 399 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

679 > 446 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2

Jeep

13 reasons for Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

272 > 115 hp
The Jeep Cherokee V is significantly faster in comparison to the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 because it has by o 137 percent bigger horsepower. The characteristic of this car will give you more fun of driving this model.
59

Maximal torque

317 > 190 Nm
The Jeep Cherokee V has 127 Nm more torque in relation to the Nissan. The difference at this level is quite big, so that the Jeep Cherokee V will be seeding up perceptibly faster.
20

Width

1,862 > 1,800 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Jeep is 3 % wider than the Nissan. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
20

Fuel tank

61 > 54 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Jeep Cherokee V which can comprise 7 liters more fuel compared with the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. The medium fuel container size in the mini 4x4 segment, from which the Jeep comes from, equals 61 liters, whereas in compact SUV segment (represented by the Nissan Qashqai II) it amounts to 61 l.
16

Wheelbase

2,698 > 2,644 mm
The Jeep Cherokee V has 54 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Nissan. Therefore the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Cylinders

6 > 4
9

Length

5,621 > 4,380 mm
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is shorter in relation to the Nissan by o 28 %, which makes that it is much more easier to drive freely in narrow jammed cities. In the „small off-road 4x4” class, in which the car of Nissan brand is classified, the medium length is 4,341 millimeters and is by 1 percent shorter than the length of Nissan.
5

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A Vee engine is a developed construction of a In-line engine which according to us is a better choice. Engine of V type in a car the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may house more cylinders in a smaller package. A Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is certainly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
4

Engine capacity

3,240 > 1,198 cc
The Jeep Cherokee V has 170 % bigger engine capacity when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. Such a substantial difference causes that comparision of this characteristics is difficult. The Nissan Qashqai II seems to be the right choice for drivers who apreciate lower fuel consumption and running costs at the expense of car’s performance, however, owners the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 would benefit from grater power, flexibility, culture of the car and consequently better fun when driving.
3

Rear track

1,581 > 1,563 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A manual transmission that is placed in the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is more simpler construction and is cheaper in usage but it is less comfortable as it requires the driver to operate clutch to shift gears and it can be lot of inconvenience in a congested urban traffic where we have lots of stop and go conditions. An automatic gearbox in the Jeep Cherokee V with gears in the amount of 5 – speeds gearbox is in our opinion better to use.
0

Payload

2,432 > 1,860 kg
0

Front track

1,589 > 1,564 mm

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg -
    Model release date 2014 2014
    Price range popular popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK