Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 vs Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

13 reasons for

Opel Antara SUV, model available from 2006.
It has 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Jeep Cherokee V, model available from 2014.
It has 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP ic petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4
Opel

13 reasons for Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.6 > 10 l
The Opel consumes 4 percent fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Jeep. The Opel Antara, which is classified in „small off-road 4x4” segment uses by 2.1 l more amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

13.2 > 13.9 l
The Opel Antara SUV uses of 5 percent fuel fewer in city traffic in comparison to the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4. The Opel Antara SUV, which is classified in compact SUV class, uses of 3.6 l of fuel for every 100 km more than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “small off-road 4x4” class equals to 9.6 l/100Km.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,400 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the highest torque is reached determines how fast an engine reaches its full output with increase in rmp. The lower rmp or the longer range at which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

7.5 > 7.7 l
19

Range

677 > 600 km
19

Fuel tank

65 > 61 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Opel which can carry 7 % more fuel compared with the Jeep Cherokee V. The medium fuel tank size in the small off-road 4x4 segment, which is represented by the Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4, amounts to 61 l, whereas in compact SUV segment (represented by the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4) it amounts to 61 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,713 > 2,698 mm
The Opel Antara SUV has 15 millimeters longer wheelbase than Jeep Cherokee V. Therefore the Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

489 > 432 km
11

Extra-urban range

890 > 779 km
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 446 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 12

Jeep

12 reasons for Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

272 > 140 hp
The Jeep has by 94 percent more horsepower compared to Opel Antara. The Jeep Cherokee V will be distinctly quicker speed up owing to bigger power. Also passing other vehicles while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

317 > 220 Nm
The Jeep Cherokee V has 44 % more torque in comparison to the Opel Antara. Although a large number of people do not take into account the maximum torque when choosing a automobile, it presents the best how fast a car is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is quite big and for that reason the Jeep Cherokee V will provide you with better sensation of driving.
33

Top speed

180 > 175 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Jeep Cherokee V is higher as compared to this of the Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 3 percent is little and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,862 > 1,850 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Jeep is 1 % wider than the Opel Antara. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

3,240 > 2,406 cc
The Jeep Cherokee V has 35 percent bigger engine displacement than the Opel Antara SUV. The difference is considerable. For this reason the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine displacement equals worst fuel consumption.
6

Length

5,621 > 4,570 mm
The Jeep Cherokee V is 23 percent longer in relation to the Opel Antara. Long vehicles have more interior space and in most cases have more storage space. Although the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 occurs to be better choice for families or persons who appreciate convenient rides, the Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,581 > 1,572 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a better version of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which according to us is a better choice. Engine of V layout put inside a vehicle the Jeep Cherokee V gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime can house high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Better engine work and pleasant sound is certainly to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Model release date

2014 > 2006
Production of the older vehicle began 8 years prior to its rival hence man may suspect that this vehicle is equipped with not so advanced parts used.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a drive in the city, it is worth to have an automatic but the choice of transmisison may have a substantial effect on fuel economy. Automatics may consume more or less from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Front track

1,589 > 1,560 mm

Cars specifications

Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,495 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK