Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 vs Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual

Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Source: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

17 reasons for

Jeep Cherokee V, model available from 2014.
It has 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP ic petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy dCi 90HP diesel engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual

17 reasons for Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual

Reasons for

Maximal power

272 > 90 hp
The Renault Captur noticeably loses with the Jeep Cherokee V in the category of amount of horses under the hood having them by 202 % less. As a result the engine installed in the Jeep produces lots of power and rapid acceleration.

Maximal torque

317 > 220 Nm
The Jeep has 44 percent more torque in relation to the Renault. Even though most of drivers do not take into account the maximum torque when choosing a vehicle, it informs the best how a vehicle acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is of considerable size thus the Jeep Cherokee V will provide you with better sensation of driving.

Top speed

180 > 171 km/h
The maximum speed of the Jeep Cherokee V is greater in comparison to this of the Renault Captur which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 9 kilometers/hour is little and is not realy noticable in daily driving.


1,862 > 1,778 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 is 5 % wider than the Renault. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.

Fuel tank

61 > 46 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank size is Jeep Cherokee V that is able to hold by 15 l more fuel in comparison to the Renault.


2,698 > 2,601 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. Jeep has 4 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Jeep should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.


6 > 4

Engine capacity

3,240 > 1,462 cc
The engine capacity of the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual is so much lower ( the difference amounts to 1,778 cc in comparison to the Renault Captur, that it not reallu have a sense to make the decision which car you should buy. These cars are so different that on the basis of information of engine size we can only pick between engine’s performance and car’s economy.


5,621 > 4,122 mm
The Jeep is longer than the Renault Captur by 36 percent and it gives to passengers much more room inside the cabin or more roomy trunk. In the „compact SUV” segment, to which the car of brand Jeep is assigned, the average length is of 4,341 millimeters and is by 1,280 mm greater than the length of the Jeep.

Rear track

1,581 > 1,514 mm

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a better construction of a In-line engine which in our opinion} is wiser to choose one. Engine of V type put inside a car the Jeep gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can contain more cylinders in a smaller package. A Smooth engine work and thrilling sound is to driving fans undoubtedly to a V engine’s advantage.

Model release date

2014 > 2013
The difference in release date between compared vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Jeep Cherokee V may have more advanced solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.


automatic > manual
For drivers who appreciate more convenient use of a vehicle and who don’t want to struggle with complications that stems from the stick shift we recommend cars equipped with automatic transmission. To those who have a flair for sport driving a manual gearbox might be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a gear is changed.


2,432 > 1,733 kg

Front track

1,589 > 1,529 mm


12 > 8

Curb weight

2,033 > 1,169 kg


9 reasons for Renault Captur Energy dCi 90KM manual in comparison to Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for

Average consumption

3.8 > 10 l
The fuel economy of the Jeep Cherokee V looks quite poor in comparison to the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. The difference at the level of 6.2 l makes the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual better choice if you do not want to go broke because of rising prices of fuel at petrol stations.

Urban consumption

4.2 > 13.9 l
The Renault Captur consumes of 9.7 l diesel fewer in city traffic compared to the Jeep. The Renault Captur, as a representative of compact SUV class, uses of 5.4 l of fuel for every 100 km fewer than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “compact SUV” segment is 9.6 l of fuel for every 100 km.

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
This huge difference stems from the fact that both cars have various engines. The Renault is equipped with the diesel engine and the Jeep Cherokee V has the petrol engine. As both cars have different types of engines, comparing this feature seems to be pointless.

Extra-urban consumption

3.4 > 7.7 l


1,250 > 600 km

Urban range

1,071 > 432 km

Extra-urban range

1,324 > 779 km

Maximum load capacity

559 > 399 kg

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,500 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2014 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,432 kg 1,733 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK