Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 vs Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4

Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

15 reasons for

Jeep Cherokee V, model available from 2014.
It has 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP ic petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

13 reasons for

Subaru XV, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6i 114HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4
Jeep

15 reasons for Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

272 > 114 hp
The Jeep Cherokee V is considerably faster than the Jeep because it has by o 139 % more horsepower. The acceleration of this vehicle offers you more joy of travelling this model.
59

Maximal torque

317 > 150 Nm
The difference at the level of 111 percent is really substantial thanks to which the Jeep has much more better flexibility of the engine, it speeds up significantly faster and has stronger towing capacity.
33

Top speed

180 > 179 km/h
The top velocity of the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 is greater as compared to this of the Subaru XV which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 1 kilometer per hour is little and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,862 > 1,779 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Jeep Cherokee V is 5 percent wider when compared to the Subaru. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,698 > 2,635 mm
Jeep Cherokee V has 63 mm longer wheelbase than the Subaru. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

3,240 > 1,601 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Subaru is so much lower ( the difference amounts to 1,639 cubic centimeters in comparison to the Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4, that it not reallu have a sense to take the decision which vehicle you should buy. These cars are so dissimilar that on the ground of information about engine displacement we can only pick between car’s performance and car’s economy.
6

Length

5,621 > 4,450 mm
The Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 is longer in comparison to the Subaru by 1,171 mm and it offers to its passengers much more room inside the cabin as well as it has more capable boot. In the „mini 4x4” segment, to which the car of manufacturer Jeep is assigned, the average length is of 4,341 mm and is by 29 percent smaller than the length of the Jeep Cherokee V.
4

Rear track

1,581 > 1,525 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > boxer
1

Model release date

2014 > 2012
The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Jeep Cherokee V may feature more modern technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic transmission in the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 despite having a few drawback gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city the driver is more relaxed. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Payload

2,432 > 1,945 kg
0

Front track

1,589 > 1,525 mm
0

Curb weight

2,033 > 1,457 kg

Subaru

13 reasons for Subaru XV 1.6i 114KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.3 > 10 l
The Subaru XV consumes 37 % fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Jeep Cherokee V. The difference at the level of 3.7 l will be significant in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long run it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

8 > 13.9 l
The Subaru XV burns up 5.9 l of petrol less while driving inside city in comparison to the Jeep Cherokee V. The Subaru XV, that comes from compact SUV segment, uses 1.6 l less petrol, which is by 16 percent better fuel consumption than the average in the same segment. The difference in fuel economy between compared vehicles is really significant, so remember that in order to the the comparison have a sense, you should pick up models of similar characteristics.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,000 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is produced has an impact on an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is good to check a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.8 > 7.7 l
19

Range

923 > 600 km
12

Urban range

750 > 432 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,034 > 779 km
9

Ground clearance

218 > 201 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in many important features of a car. Ride height is very important in SUV vehicles though all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Subaru XV has 8 % larger clearance in comparison to the Jeep. Apart from effective mobility in rough terrain, the Subaru will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high curbs, for example.
8

Maximum load capacity

480 > 399 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

653 > 446 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 12

Cars specifications

Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight - 1,505 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2014 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK