Subaru XV 2.0D 147HP manual 4x4 vs Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Subaru XV 2.0D 147HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

16 reasons for

Subaru XV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0D 147HP diesel engine produced from 2012.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

13 reasons for

Jeep Cherokee V, model available from 2014.
It has 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP ic petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4
Subaru

16 reasons for Subaru XV 2.0D 147KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

5.4 > 10 l
The Subaru XV 2.0D 147HP manual 4x4 consumes 4.6 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Jeep Cherokee V. The difference in the amount of 46 percent will be realy noticeable in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long period of time it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

350 > 317 Nm
Maximum torque of the Subaru XV is 10 percent bigger than the Jeep Cherokee V. As a result, the Subaru XV 2.0D 147HP manual 4x4 will accelerate slightly swifter and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Subaru XV 2.0D 147HP manual 4x4 will use on average fever fuel for every 100 km.
54

Urban consumption

6.8 > 13.9 l
The Subaru XV burns up of 7.1 l oil less running around the town than the Jeep Cherokee V. The Subaru XV, which is classified in compact SUV segment, consumes of 2.8 l per 100 km fewer than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “small off-road 4x4” segment equals to 9.6 l per 100 km.
29

Maximal torque RPM

1,600 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
Such a big difference stems from the fact that both compared vehicles have various engines. The Subaru has the diesel engine and the Jeep Cherokee V is equipped with the petrol engine. Taking into consideration different kinds of engines, comparing this characteristic seems to be pointless.
28

Top speed

198 > 180 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Subaru XV 2.0D 147HP manual 4x4 is greater in relation to of the Jeep Cherokee V by 18 km/h, which allows the Subaru to travel quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 10 % is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
23

Extra-urban consumption

5 > 7.7 l
16

Range

1,071 > 600 km
12

Urban range

882 > 432 km
9

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Subaru XV has a one extra gear than the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4. Most often this additional gear is used as an overdrive thanks to which the previous gears can be narrower to give better acceleration in the lower gears. One more gear as well affect lower fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Ground clearance

218 > 201 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in many important features of a vehicle. Ride height is the most important in off-road vehicles though all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Subaru has 17 mm larger clearance in comparison to the Jeep Cherokee V. Apart from easier mobility in rough terrain, the Subaru XV 2.0D 147HP manual 4x4 will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as large curbs, for example.
8

Extra-urban range

1,200 > 779 km
7

Maximum load capacity

435 > 399 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

3,600 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

653 > 446 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2

Jeep

13 reasons for Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Subaru XV 2.0D 147HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

272 > 147 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of us take into account at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Jeep Cherokee V which has by 125 more horsepower in comparison to the Subaru XV 2.0D 147HP manual 4x4. Therefore the Jeep Cherokee V can reach higher speed. Due to more horsepower the Jeep Cherokee V should also provide seemingly more flexiblility in specific gears.
20

Width

1,862 > 1,779 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 is 83 millimeters wider in relation to the Subaru XV. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
16

Wheelbase

2,698 > 2,635 mm
Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 has 63 mm longer wheelbase when compared to the Subaru XV 2.0D 147HP manual 4x4. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Cylinders

6 > 4
9

Length

5,621 > 4,450 mm
The Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 is longer in relation to the Subaru XV by 26 percent and it gives to passengers much more room in the cabin as well as it has more capable trunk. In the „compact SUV” class, to which the car of manufacturer Jeep is assigned, the average length amouts to 4,341 millimeters and is by 29 % smaller than the length of the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4.
5

Cylinder layout

V-type > boxer
4

Engine capacity

3,240 > 1,999 cc
The Jeep Cherokee V has 1,241 cc bigger engine size in comparison to the Subaru XV. The difference is relatively considerable. For this reason the Jeep Cherokee V should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand greater engine capacity usually affects worst fuel economy.
3

Rear track

1,581 > 1,525 mm
2

Model release date

2014 > 2012
The difference in release date between presented cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Jeep Cherokee V may have more advanced solutions.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a comfortable drive around town, it is good to have an automatic however the type of transmisison may have a big impact on fuel consumption. Automatics may burn up from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Payload

2,432 > 1,965 kg
0

Front track

1,589 > 1,525 mm
0

Curb weight

2,033 > 1,522 kg

Cars specifications

Subaru XV 2.0D 147HP manual 4x4 Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,605 kg -
    Model release date 2012 2014
    Price range popular popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK