Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 vs Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual

Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

17 reasons for

Jeep Cherokee V, model available from 2014.
It has 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP ic petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Suzuki SX4 II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 VVT 120HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual
Jeep

17 reasons for Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

272 > 120 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that majority of car fans attach the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4, that has by 127 % more horsepower than the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual, which makes this vehicle really better in terms of top speed. With more horsepower the Jeep should also give considerably more flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

317 > 156 Nm
When you step on the gas pedal and you start accelerating fast, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will experience it better driving the Jeep Cherokee V as it has 103 percent more torque when compared to the Suzuki SX4 II. Compared vehicles differ so much that only riding the Jeep you will experience a pleasurable sensations of getting pinned back in the seat when it begins to accelerate.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,300 > 4,400 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower number of rotations at which the highest torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is recommended to see a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,862 > 1,762 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Jeep Cherokee V is 100 millimeters wider when compared to the Suzuki SX4 II. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

61 > 50 l
The Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual gives way to the Jeep Cherokee V in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 is able to store by 22 % more fuel than its contender.
15

Wheelbase

2,698 > 2,595 mm
The Jeep Cherokee V has 103 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to Suzuki SX4 II. Therefore the Jeep Cherokee V is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
9

Ground clearance

201 > 172 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in many important characteristics of a car. It is the most important for SUV vehicles though all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Jeep Cherokee V has 29 mm larger clearance in relation to the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Jeep Cherokee V will also be easier to overcome city obstacles like high kerbstones, for example.
8

Engine capacity

3,240 > 1,587 cc
The Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 has 1,653 cc larger engine size than the Suzuki SX4 II. Such a substantial difference makes that comparision of this values have little sense. The Suzuki SX4 II would be the right choice for those who apreciate lower fuel consumption and vehicle operating costs at the expense of slower driving, however, owners the Jeep Cherokee V would benefit from better power, durability, smoothness of the car and consequently more fun from driving.
6

Length

5,621 > 4,295 mm
The Jeep Cherokee V is longer in comparison to the Suzuki SX4 II by 1,326 millimeters and it offers to passengers much more space for legs inside the car as well as it has more capable trunk. In the „compact SUV” class, to which the car of brand Jeep is assigned, the average length amouts to 4,341 millimeters and is by 1,280 mm greater than the length of the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4.
4

Rear track

1,581 > 1,505 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A Vee engine is a improved construction of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which as far as we are concerned is wiser to choose one. Engine of V characteristic installed inside a the Jeep Cherokee V produces more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime can contain high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Smooth engine work and nicer sound is to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Model release date

2014 > 2013
Because of the fact that the Suzuki SX4 II's production began only 1 year before the Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4, the gap between technology applied in both cars is not really huge, however, the Jeep may feature a bit more new solutions used in it.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a smooth travelling in the city, it is good to have an automatic however the type of transmisison may have a considerable effect on fuel efficiency. Automatics may use somewhere from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Payload

2,432 > 1,735 kg
0

Front track

1,589 > 1,538 mm
0

Curb weight

2,033 > 1,090 kg

Suzuki

10 reasons for Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120KM manual in comparison to Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 10 l
The Suzuki SX4 II consumes 4.4 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Jeep Cherokee V. The difference at the level of 4.4 l will be quite realy noticeable in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long run it will result in a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 13.9 l
The Suzuki SX4 II uses 7.1 l less fuel in the city than the Jeep Cherokee V. The difference at the level of 7.1 l is very big in use of vehicle. Additionally, during several years it may generate real and noticeable cost savings. Also bear in mind that medium results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably raised if you ride dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the cars compared by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 7.7 l
19

Range

909 > 600 km
12

Urban range

735 > 432 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,042 > 779 km
8

Maximum load capacity

645 > 399 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

6,000 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 12

Cars specifications

Jeep Cherokee V 3.2 V6 Active Drive Lock 272HP automatic 4x4 Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2014 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,432 kg 1,735 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK