Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

11 reasons for

Jeep Compass SUV, model available from 2007.
It has 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, model available from 2005.
It has 1.6 i 16V 106HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
Jeep

11 reasons for Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 106 hp
The Jeep comes with petrol which delivers by 60 percent more horsepower than the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It seems to be better car to those who would like to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

222 > 145 Nm
Because of 77 newton meters more torque, the engine of the Jeep Compass SUV does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. This, in turn, have positive implications for a car's acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.7 > 14.4 s
If a fast driving is what you are keen on, the Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4 will appeal to you because it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 3.7 s faster in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4.
38

Trunk capacity

335 > 186 l
The Jeep Compass SUV features 149 liters larger trunk in relation to the Suzuki. Such a difference is quite big therefore it will matters in terms of the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Jeep Compass SUV has 110 l bigger trunk size than the average in its class. Bigger boot will be useful during family journeys as well as while daily car’s usage.
33

Top speed

183 > 160 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4 is higher in comparison to this of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 14 percent is little and is not realy noticable in daily use.
15

Wheelbase

2,640 > 2,636 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Jeep Compass SUV has 4 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Suzuki Grand Vitara II. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Jeep Compass should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
8

Engine capacity

2,360 > 1,587 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Jeep Compass is by 773 cc greater in relation to the Suzuki. In a consequence the Suzuki will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Jeep Compass SUV will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.
1

Model release date

2007 > 2005
Given that the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV's production started only 2 years prior to the Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Jeep Compass might feature slightly more new solutions applied in it.
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

60 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,437 > 1,405 kg

Suzuki

10 reasons for Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.3 > 8.7 l
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II uses 0.4 l fewer in the mixed cycle when compared to the Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4. The difference at the level of 0.4 l is not very appreciable. At the same time in the long run it can generate a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

10.2 > 10.5 l
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV uses 0.3 l fewer petrol in the city than the Jeep Compass SUV. The Suzuki, which comes from compact SUV class, consumes 0.6 l less petrol. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the small off-road 4x4 segment equals to 9.6 l, while the Suzuki burns up by 7 % more fuel than the average.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,100 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the maximum torque is produced determines how fast an engine reaches its full performance with increase in rotational speed. The lower rotational speed or the longer range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt faster.
24

Extra-urban consumption

7 > 7.6 l
6

Length

4,467 > 4,404 mm
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV is 1 % longer than the Jeep Compass SUV. Long cars more of passenger space and also provide more storage space. Although the Suzuki seems to be better pick for families or those who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4 may be more appropriate to women because it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,570 > 1,520 mm
1

Height

1,695 > 1,630 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 4 % in favor of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II is not big and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,900 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,540 > 1,520 mm

Cars specifications

Jeep Compass SUV 2.4 DOHC 16v 170HP manual 4x4 Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2007 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload - 1,828 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK