Jeep Grand Cherokee II 4.0 i 190HP manual 4x4 vs Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Jeep Grand Cherokee II 4.0 i 190HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

7 reasons for

Jeep Grand Cherokee II, model available from 1998 to 2004.
It has 4.0 i 190HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

2 reasons for

Mercury Mariner I, model available from 2005 to 2007.
It has 2.3 155HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2007.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP
Jeep

7 reasons for Jeep Grand Cherokee II 4.0 i 190KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

190 > 155 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that majority of us pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Jeep Grand Cherokee II 4.0 i 190HP manual 4x4 that has by 23 % horsepower more when compared to the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP, which makes this car somewhat better in terms of high speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Jeep will as well provide somewhat better efficiency in specific speeds.
38

Trunk capacity

1,103 > 829 l
With more trunk space the Jeep will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional vehicle than the Mercury Mariner I. If the size of the trunk is appeals to you, the Jeep Grand Cherokee II will be better to buy as it is around 33 % more spacious than the trunk of its rival.
22

Width

1,836 > 1,790 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly affects interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The width of the Jeep Grand Cherokee II 4.0 i 190HP manual 4x4 is larger by 46 millimeters in comparison to the Mercury Mariner I and is not really worth considering. The average for the „large SUV” class amounts to around 1,866 mm and is by 2 percent smaller than the same feature of the Jeep Grand Cherokee II 4.0 i 190HP manual 4x4.
19

Fuel tank

79 > 62 l
The Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP loses with the Jeep Grand Cherokee II in the category of fuel tank size. The Jeep Grand Cherokee II is able to carry by 17 liters more fuel in relation to its rival.
15

Wheelbase

2,682 > 2,627 mm
Jeep has 55 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Mercury. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
6

Length

4,605 > 4,428 mm
The Jeep Grand Cherokee II is 4 percent longer in relation to the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP. The length of the car plays a role in terms of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Jeep Grand Cherokee II very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Jeep Grand Cherokee II will be better driven but the Mercury Mariner I will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
1

Height

1,763 > 1,730 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference that amounts to 2 percent to the advantage of the Jeep Grand Cherokee II is little and does not matter much.

Mercury

2 reasons for Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155KM in comparison to Jeep Grand Cherokee II 4.0 i 190HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
1

Model release date

2005 > 1998
Manufacture of the older car commenced 7 years prior to its rival thus man may suspect that this vehicle is equipped with not so modern technologies used.
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2004

Cars specifications

Jeep Grand Cherokee II 4.0 i 190HP manual 4x4 Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1998 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Code name WJ -
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK