Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee III 3.7 i V6 2WD 213HP automatic 4x4

Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

10 reasons for

Suzuki XL7, model available from 2007 to 2009.
It has 3.6 V6 252HP ic petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2009.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Jeep Grand Cherokee III, model available from 2004 to 2010.
It has 3.7 i V6 2WD 213HP ic petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

Jeep Grand Cherokee III 3.7 i V6 2WD 213HP automatic 4x4
Suzuki

10 reasons for Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Grand Cherokee III 3.7 i V6 2WD 213HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

252 > 213 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of us pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4 that has by 39 horsepower more when compared to the Jeep, which makes this vehicle somewhat quicker. Due to more horsepower the Suzuki XL7 should as well give somewhat more efficiency in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

329 > 309 Nm
Maximum torque of the Suzuki XL7 is 6 percent greater than the Jeep Grand Cherokee III. Because of this, the Suzuki XL7 will accelerate a little bit better and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Suzuki XL7 will burn up on average fever fuel for every 100 km.
56

Urban consumption

13.8 > 17.6 l
The Suzuki XL7 burns up 3.8 l less fuel in urban cycle in relation to the Jeep. The difference at the level of 22 percent will be very big in daily using vehicle. Additionally, within years it may bring gigantic cost savings. Moreover bear in mind that presented results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably lifted if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles compared by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,300 > 3,700 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached determines an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is worth to analyze a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

10.1 > 10.6 l
15

Wheelbase

2,850 > 2,783 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Suzuki XL7 has 2 percent longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Jeep Grand Cherokee III 3.7 i V6 2WD 213HP automatic 4x4. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Suzuki XL7 should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

507 > 443 km
6

Length

5,009 > 4,745 mm
The Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4 is 6 % longer in relation to the Jeep Grand Cherokee III. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Suzuki XL7 very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4 will be better driven but the Jeep Grand Cherokee III 3.7 i V6 2WD 213HP automatic 4x4 will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length .
1

Model release date

2007 > 2004
Because of the fact that the Jeep was launched only 3 years earlier than the Suzuki XL7, the gap between technology used in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Suzuki XL7 may feature a bit more new solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,750 > 1,722 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Suzuki XL7, which is by 28 mm higher than the Jeep Grand Cherokee III, is better pick for you. However, these two cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.

Jeep

7 reasons for Jeep Grand Cherokee III 3.7 i V6 2WD 213KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
22

Width

1,862 > 1,834 mm
Width of a car directly influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The Jeep Grand Cherokee III is widther by 2 % in comparison to the Suzuki XL7 and is not really important. The average for the „large 4x4 ” class is approximately 1,866 millimeters and is by 4 mm smaller than the same feature of the Jeep Grand Cherokee III 3.7 i V6 2WD 213HP automatic 4x4.
19

Fuel tank

79 > 70 l
The Suzuki XL7 gives way to the Jeep Grand Cherokee III 3.7 i V6 2WD 213HP automatic 4x4 in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Jeep Grand Cherokee III is able to carry by 13 percent more fuel in relation to its contender.
11

Extra-urban range

736 > 686 km
8

Engine capacity

3,701 > 3,565 cc
The Jeep has 136 cubic centimeters greater engine displacement compared to the Suzuki. As the difference is not big, the Jeep Grand Cherokee III should accelerate only a bit better, of course assuming that other paramerters are the same.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 6,400 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2010 > 2009
0

Curb weight

1,925 > 1,833 kg

Cars specifications

Suzuki XL7 3.6 V6 252HP automatic 4x4 Jeep Grand Cherokee III 3.7 i V6 2WD 213HP automatic 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2007 2004
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - WK
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK