Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

18 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 8 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV, model available from 2010.
It has 3.6 V6 286HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4
Land Rover

18 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

340 > 286 hp
The horsepower of the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 is 54 horsepowers grater when compared to the Jeep. As the difference is little this should not affect the car performance considerably.
59

Maximal torque

448 > 349 Nm
Because of 28 % higher torque, the engine of the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV. This, in turn, have a positive impact on a car's acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

14.5 > 16 l
The fuel consumption of the Land Rover is 1.5 l smaller in relation to the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV. Despite the fact that the difference is small, in the long run it can make that your vehicle would be much cheper to utilize.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.3 > 9.1 s
The Jeep speeds up relatively slower than the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV. The difference in the amount of 1.8 s is not really significant and it should not be strongly taken by you into consideration for buying one of compared cars.
38

Trunk capacity

909 > 782 l
The boot of the Land Rover Range Rover IV is only 127 l bigger than the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV. However, the difference is so little that it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar trunk size.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,031 > 1,546 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,500 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the maximum torque is reached tells us how fast an engine reaches its best output with increase in rmp. The lower rotational speed or the longer range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt earlier.
22

Width

2,073 > 1,943 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV is widther by 130 mm compared with the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV and is not really relevant. The medium for the „large 4x4 ” segment equals to 1,866 mm and is by 207 mm smaller than the width of the Land Rover Range Rover IV.
15

Wheelbase

2,926 > 2,908 mm
The Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 has 1 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Jeep. Consequently the Land Rover Range Rover IV is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
9

Ground clearance

295 > 220 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in several important parameters of a car. It is the most important for off-road vehicles though all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Land Rover Range Rover IV has 34 percent higher clearance when compared with the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high curbs, for example.
6

Length

4,999 > 4,822 mm
The Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV is 177 mm longer in relation to the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV. Long vehicles more of passenger space and in most cases provide plenty of trunk space. While the Land Rover Range Rover IV occurs to be better choice for families or persons who value soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV may be more appropriate to the young because it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,681 > 1,634 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2012 > 2010
The difference in debut day between compared vehicles is only 2 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Land Rover Range Rover IV may feature more modern technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,836 > 1,766 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of loading massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 4 % to the advantage of the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 is small and does not matter much.
0

Front track

1,690 > 1,628 mm
0

Valves

24 > 22
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,225 > 2,154 mm

Jeep

4 reasons for Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

11.4 > 12.5 l
The Jeep Grand Cherokee IV consumes 1.1 l less fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV. The Jeep, which is palced in „large SUV” class burns up by 0.8 l less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 12.2 l.
24

Extra-urban consumption

8.8 > 10.7 l
8

Engine capacity

3,605 > 2,994 cc
The Jeep has 611 cubic centimeters larger engine size in comparison to the Land Rover. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 should accelerate only slightly better, if other paramerters are does not play a role.
0

Maximal power RPM

6,350 > 6,500 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2012 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - WK2
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK