Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 vs Mazda CX-7 SUV 2.3 244HP automatic

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV, model available from 2010.
It has 3.6 V6 286HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

4 reasons for

Mazda CX-7 SUV, model available from 2007 to 2012.
It has 2.3 244HP ic petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

Mazda CX-7 SUV 2.3 244HP automatic
Jeep

12 reasons for Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Mazda CX-7 SUV 2.3 244HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

286 > 244 hp
The horsepower of the Jeep is 17 % bigger in comparison to the Mazda CX-7 SUV. As the difference is not big it should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
33

Top speed

206 > 188 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV is higher in comparison to this of the Mazda CX-7 SUV 2.3 244HP automatic which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 10 percent is not big and is imperceptible in daily driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

8.8 > 9.4 l
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

3,605 > 2,260 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Jeep is by 60 % bigger in comparison to the Mazda CX-7 SUV. For this reason the Mazda CX-7 SUV will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 will be of better quality, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a improved version of a In-line engine which in our opinion} is {a better one. Engine of V type put in a the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV produces more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may house high numbers of cylinders in a smaller package. A Smooth engine work and thrilling sound is certainly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
1

Model release date

2010 > 2007
Because of the fact that the Mazda was unveiled only 3 years before the Jeep, the gap between technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 might feature slightly more new solutions used in it.
1

Tire width

265 > 235 mm
0

Valves

22 > 16
0

Tire diameter

20 > 18 ″
0

Tire profile

50 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

2,343 > 1,681 kg

Mazda

4 reasons for Mazda CX-7 SUV 2.3 244KM automat in comparison to Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

10.5 > 11.4 l
The Mazda uses 0.9 l fewer in the mixed cycle than the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV. The difference in the amount of 8 % is not very appreciable. However within some time it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

12.9 > 16 l
The Mazda burns up 19 percent fewer petrol while driving inside city in comparison to the Jeep. The Mazda CX-7, that comes from full-size SUV segment, uses 1.9 l less petrol. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the large 4x4 class equals to 14.8 l, whereas the Mazda CX-7 uses by 13 % less fuel than the average.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,505 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the highest torque is delivered tells us how fast an engine achieves its best performance with growth in rmp. The lower rotational speed or the longer range in which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt faster.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,350 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 Mazda CX-7 SUV 2.3 244HP automatic
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Code name WK2 -
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK