Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

16 reasons for

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV, model available from 2010.
It has 3.6 V6 286HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

9 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.5 DI-D 178HP diesel engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
Jeep

16 reasons for Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

286 > 178 hp
The Jeep Grand Cherokee IV has 108 horsepowers more horsepower in relation to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II. The Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 will be distinctly better accelerate thanks to grater amout of horses under its hoot. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing cars or obstacles should be a piece of cake for a vehicle equipped with more powerful engine.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.1 > 11.7 s
A little difference in the amount of 2.6 s suggests that the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV is insensibly beaten in this confrontation. In the „large off-road 4x4” class, to which the Mitsubishi is assigned, the average acceleration is 10.5 s and is by 11 percent faster than acceleration of Mitsubishi’s car.
38

Trunk capacity

782 > 714 l
The trunk of the Jeep is only 68 liters bigger than the Mitsubishi. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both vehicles have more of less the same boot space.
33

Top speed

206 > 179 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Jeep is greater in relation to of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II by 27 km/h, which allows the Jeep to travel quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 15 % is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,943 > 1,813 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Jeep is 130 mm wider in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,908 > 2,806 mm
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV has 4 percent longer wheelbase when compared to the Mitsubishi. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
9

Ground clearance

220 > 217 mm
Ground clearance is a critical factor in several relevant features of a car. It is the most important in SUV vehicles though all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 has 1 % higher clearance in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4. Apart from effective mobility in rough terrain, the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high curbs, for example.
8

Engine capacity

3,605 > 2,476 cc
The Jeep Grand Cherokee IV has 1,129 cubic centimeters greater engine capacity in comparison to the Mitsubishi. The difference is relatively big. For this reason the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine displacement usually affects worst fuel economy.
6

Length

4,822 > 4,695 mm
The Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 is 127 millimeters longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II. The length of the vehicle plays a role in respect of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Jeep Grand Cherokee IV very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV will be better driven ,however, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,634 > 1,513 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a improved construction of a engine with all cylinders aligned in one row which as far as we are concerned is wiser to choose one. Engine of V layout installed inside a vehicle the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor may house high numbers of cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is to driving fans certainly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a gentle ride in the city, it is good to have an automatic but the choice of transmisison may have a substantial effect on fuel efficiency. Automatics may burn up from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Front track

1,628 > 1,520 mm
0

Valves

22 > 16
0

Curb weight

2,343 > 2,047 kg

Mitsubishi

9 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.4 > 11.4 l
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV burns up 26 percent fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4. The difference at the level of 3 l will be perceptible in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long run it will result in a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

398 > 349 Nm
Maximum torque of the Mitsubishi is 14 % higher than the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV. For this reason, the Mitsubishi will accelerate somewhat swifter and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II will use fever fuel for every 100 km.
56

Urban consumption

9.8 > 16 l
The fuel economy in city traffic is considerably to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4's advantage. This vehicle uses 6.2 l less diesel running around the town in comparison to the Jeep. Better fuel econumy means less fuel cost passed on you.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,813 > 1,546 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,995 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
This big difference stems from the fact that both vehicles are equipped with various engines. The Mitsubishi has the diesel engine whereas the Jeep is equipped with the petrol engine. As both cars have different kinds of engines, comparing this feature is pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

7.3 > 8.8 l
1

Model release date

2012 > 2010
The difference in release date between presented vehicles is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II may have more modern solutions.
1

Height

1,838 > 1,766 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 4 percent to the advantage of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV is little and should not be really noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,350 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight - 2,499 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Code name WK2 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK