Volkswagen Touareg II 3.6 V6 FSI BlueMotion 280HP automatic 4x4 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4

Volkswagen Touareg II 3.6 V6 FSI BlueMotion 280HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

12 reasons for

Volkswagen Touareg II, model available from 2010.
It has 3.6 V6 FSI BlueMotion 280HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 8 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV, model available from 2010.
It has 3.6 V6 286HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4
Volkswagen

12 reasons for Volkswagen Touareg II 3.6 V6 FSI BlueMotion 280KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.9 > 11.4 l
The Volkswagen Touareg II consumes 1.5 l less in the combined cycle when compared to the Jeep. The difference at the level of 1.5 l is not perceptible. Nevertheless during a longer period of time it can generate a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

360 > 349 Nm
The Volkswagen Touareg II 3.6 V6 FSI BlueMotion 280HP automatic 4x4 has 3 percent more torque when compared to the Jeep. Even though a large number of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a car, it describes the best how fast a car acclerates. When it comes to compared cars the difference is quite small and for that reason it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
56

Urban consumption

13 > 16 l
The Volkswagen Touareg II burns 19 percent less fuel in city traffic compared with the Jeep. The difference at the level of 19 % is quite significant in use of car. Additionally, during years it may give gigantic cost savings. Moreover keep in mind that presented results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably raised if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so big that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.8 > 9.1 s
A small difference that amounts to 1.3 s suggests that the Jeep is the worst car of these two compared. In the „full-size SUV segment, being represented by the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.5 s and is by 14 percent lower than this of Jeep car.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,644 > 1,546 l
33

Top speed

228 > 206 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Volkswagen Touareg II is greater than this of the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV by 11, which allows the Volkswagen Touareg II 3.6 V6 FSI BlueMotion 280HP automatic 4x4 to overcome faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 22 kilometers per hour is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,195 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is delivered determines an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. Still, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always recommended to analyze a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

8 > 8.8 l
4

Rear track

1,677 > 1,634 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

6,200 > 6,350 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,656 > 1,628 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,210 > 2,154 mm

Jeep

9 reasons for Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Volkswagen Touareg II 3.6 V6 FSI BlueMotion 280HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

286 > 280 hp
The horsepower of the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 is by 6 hp bigger than the Volkswagen Touareg II. As the difference is little it should not affect the car performance largely.
38

Trunk capacity

782 > 581 l
The Jeep features 201 l larger trunk than the Volkswagen Touareg II 3.6 V6 FSI BlueMotion 280HP automatic 4x4. Such a difference is significant so it will matters in terms of the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 has 4 % bigger trunk capacity than the average in its segment. Bigger luggage compartment will be useful during family journeys and also while everyday car’s usage.
22

Width

1,943 > 1,940 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 is widther only by 3 mm than the Volkswagen Touareg II and is not really important. The medium for the „large 4x4 ” segment equals to 1,866 millimeters and is by 4 percent larger than the width of the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV.
15

Wheelbase

2,908 > 2,894 mm
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 has 14 mm longer wheelbase than the Volkswagen Touareg II. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, cars with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
9

Ground clearance

220 > 199 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in several relevant characteristics of a vehicle. Ride height is very important in SUV cars though all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Jeep has 11 % higher clearance in comparison to the Volkswagen Touareg II. In addition to effective mobility in rough terrain, the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high kerbstones, for example.
8

Engine capacity

3,605 > 3,597 cc
The Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 has by 8 cubic centimeters bigger engine size in comparison to the Volkswagen Touareg II. This play a little role in terms of acceleration, as both figures does not vary much.
6

Length

4,822 > 4,799 mm
The Jeep is 23 millimeters longer when compared to the Volkswagen Touareg II 3.6 V6 FSI BlueMotion 280HP automatic 4x4. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and in most cases have plenty of trunk space. Although the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 occurs to be better pick for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Volkswagen Touareg II may appeal to the young because it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Height

1,766 > 1,709 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV, which is by 3 % higher than the Volkswagen Touareg II, would be appropriate choice for you. However, presented cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Curb weight

2,343 > 2,100 kg

Cars specifications

Volkswagen Touareg II 3.6 V6 FSI BlueMotion 280HP automatic 4x4 Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 3,502 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - WK2
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK