Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual vs Jeep Wrangler I 2.5 i 121HP manual

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

18 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 MIVEC 117HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Jeep Wrangler I, model available from 1987 to 1995.
It has 2.5 i 121HP petrol engine produced from 1991 to 1995.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Jeep Wrangler I 2.5 i 121HP manual
Mitsubishi

18 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117KM manual in comparison to Jeep Wrangler I 2.5 i 121HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.2 > 13.7 l
The Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual uses 7.5 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to in comparison to the Jeep. The difference at the level of 55 percent is big and obviously buying the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual will result in saving a considerable amount of money. Additionally, fuel efficiency helps to output less pollution.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.4 > 14.8 s
A small difference that amounts to 23 % shows that the Jeep Wrangler I is the worst car of these two compared. In the „compact SUV class, being represented by the Jeep Wrangler I, the average acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.9 s and is by 36 percent higher than this of Jeep car.
38

Trunk capacity

418 > 354 l
With more trunk space the Mitsubishi ASX SUV will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional one compared with the Jeep Wrangler I. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is what does appeal to you, the Mitsubishi will be better to buy as it is around 64 liters more spacious than the boot of the Jeep Wrangler I 2.5 i 121HP manual.
33

Top speed

183 > 150 km/h
The maximum velocity of the Mitsubishi ASX SUV is higher as compared to this of the Jeep Wrangler I 2.5 i 121HP manual which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 22 percent is not big and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,770 > 1,678 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Mitsubishi is 92 mm wider when compared to the Jeep Wrangler I. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

1,050 > 555 km
15

Wheelbase

2,676 > 2,363 mm
Mitsubishi ASX SUV has 313 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to the Jeep. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
8

Maximum load capacity

625 > 490 kg
6

Length

4,296 > 3,859 mm
The Mitsubishi is 11 % longer in comparison to the Jeep Wrangler I. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Mitsubishi ASX preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi ASX SUV will be better driven ,however, the Jeep Wrangler I will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,525 > 1,473 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 2
A way more comfortable and useful vehicle is five-door Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. The two-door version of Jeep Wrangler I features little advantages, except for sporty design.
1

Model release date

2010 > 1987
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Front track

1,525 > 1,473 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 75 %

Jeep

7 reasons for Jeep Wrangler I 2.5 i 121KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

121 > 117 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Jeep Wrangler I that has by 3 percent horsepower more than the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual, which makes this vehicle a bit faster. Because of more horsepower the Jeep Wrangler I 2.5 i 121HP manual will as well give a bit more efficiency in specific gears.
19

Fuel tank

77 > 62 l
The Mitsubishi ASX SUV loses with the Jeep Wrangler I in the category of fuel tank size. The Jeep Wrangler I 2.5 i 121HP manual is able to take by 24 percent more fuel in comparison to its rival.
8

Engine capacity

2,465 > 1,589 cc
The Jeep Wrangler I has 876 cc larger engine capacity in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX. The difference is relatively considerable. Consequently the Jeep Wrangler I should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand greater cubic capacity usually equals worst fuel consumption.
1

Height

1,735 > 1,615 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Jeep Wrangler I 2.5 i 121HP manual, which is by 120 mm higher than the Mitsubishi ASX SUV, is better choice for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,400 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,949 > 1,869 kg
0

Curb weight

1,462 > 1,240 kg

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual Jeep Wrangler I 2.5 i 121HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,102 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 1987
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - YJ
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK