Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 vs Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual

Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

13 reasons for

Kia Retona, model available from 1997 to 2003.
It has 2.0 i 16V 128HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2003.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Jeep Wrangler II, model available from 1997 to 2006.
It has 2.4 i 16V 147HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2006.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual
Kia

13 reasons for Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

12.8 > 14 l
The fuel consumption of the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 is 1.2 l lower in comparison to the Jeep. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long term it may cause that your vehicle would be considerably cheper to utilize.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,237 > 1,044 l
33

Top speed

160 > 155 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Kia is greater compared with of the Jeep Wrangler II by 5 km/h, which allows the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 to travel faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 % is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,749 > 1,694 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Kia is 3 percent wider in comparison to the Jeep Wrangler II. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

566 > 548 km
19

Fuel tank

59 > 58 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 that can hold 1 liter more fuel in comparison to the Jeep Wrangler II. The average fuel tank capacity in the mini 4x4 class, from which the Kia comes from, equals 61 liters, whereas in small off-road 4x4 class (represented by the Jeep) it amounts to 61 l.
12

Urban range

469 > 407 km
6

Length

4,000 > 3,883 mm
The Kia is 3 percent longer when compared to the Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual. Long cars are more spacious and usually have more storage space. Although the Kia Retona seems to be better choice for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual may appeal to women as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,483 > 1,473 mm
3

Number of doors

3 > 2
An owner of the Kia gets a one door more as a tailgate. It will allow him to put cargo into a boot in more convenient manner, especialy when we are talking about things of big size. Passages of both cars who want to travel in the back have to enter a car through a front door which requires folding a front seat.
1

Height

1,834 > 1,782 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4, which is by 3 % higher than the Jeep, would be appropriate option for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Front track

1,483 > 1,470 mm

Jeep

12 reasons for Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147KM manual in comparison to Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

147 > 128 hp
The horsepower of the Jeep Wrangler II is 15 % bigger when compared to the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4. While the difference is not big it should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
112

Average consumption

10.4 > 10.8 l
The Jeep uses 0.4 l less in the mixed cycle when compared to the Kia Retona. The difference at the level of 0.4 l is not perceptible. At the same time in the long run it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

13 > 15 s
The Jeep accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 13 sek, which is 13 % better result than the Kia Retona. But the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

252 > 231 l
The trunk of the Jeep Wrangler II is only 9 percent bigger than the Kia Retona. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both cars have more of less the same boot space.
15

Wheelbase

2,371 > 2,359 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Jeep Wrangler II has 12 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Jeep Wrangler II should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
9

Ground clearance

206 > 202 mm
Ground clearance is a critical factor in many important characteristics of a vehicle. It is very important in SUV vehicles still all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Jeep Wrangler II has 2 percent larger clearance when compared with the Kia Retona. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Jeep will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high curbs, for example.
8

Engine capacity

2,430 > 1,997 cc
The Jeep has by 433 cc bigger engine displacement when compared to the Kia. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both values does not differ much.
8

Maximum load capacity

395 > 340 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 5,400 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,002 > 1,824 kg
0

End of model sale

2006 > 2003
0

Curb weight

1,603 > 1,484 kg

Cars specifications

Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 Jeep Wrangler II 2.4 i 16V 147HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1997 1997
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - TJ
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK